<<
>>

Conclusion

This current debate in the United States over what foods to label as meat is just the latest part of a longer history of constructing eaters’ approach to meat through social, economic, and legal processes.

During this longer his­tory, plant-based meat analogues were also consistently in use and promoted in various communities through their own sets of social, economic, and legal processes. Participants in the current debates would do well to recognize this

broader history and understand that legal recognition may not be the only way to access positive values associated with particular sets of foods. Moreover, participants in these debates should tackle this broader history when addressing other labeling debates about other food categories, such as “milk,” “rice,” and “cheese.”

<< | >>
Source: Ni Kuei-Jung, Lin Ching-Fu (eds.). Food Safety and Technology Governance. Routledge,2022. — 252 p.. 2022

More on the topic Conclusion:

  1. Conclusion
  2. Conclusion
  3. CONCLUSION
  4. 7.3 CONCLUSION
  5. Conclusion
  6. Conclusion
  7. Conclusion
  8. Conclusion
  9. Conclusion
  10. CONCLUSION
  11. CONCLUSION
  12. CONCLUSION
  13. Conclusion
  14. Conclusion
  15. CONCLUSION
  16. CONCLUSION
  17. Conclusion