Conclusion
Despite the substantial centralization that has occurred in Australian federalism in general, and the health system in particular, public hospitals remain a core state government responsibility.
At first glance, it seems remarkable, then, that the states agreed to the nhra's insistence upon the creation of lhn s, along with detailed prescriptions for their governance and structure, rather than defending their autonomy to choose their own hospital governance systems. The political mandate of the Rudd-Gillard government and the prospect of additional hospital funding were no doubt key drivers for states committing to the nhra. In addition, it would seem that after many years of centralized management within each jurisdiction, a push for decentralized governance was beginning to emerge in the more populous states, with Victoria providing a working model.Our interviews indicate that beyond the initial funding disputes and the cautiousness of some smaller jurisdictions, there was very little other contention about the change. For the Commonwealth, devolved governance at state level was regarded as an important complement to enable newly established Medicare Locals (later phn s) to operate more effectively and to encourage a shift towards a more integrated, patient-centric health system able to encourage collaboration between primary health, hospitals and allied services. For the states, there was general agreement that devolution could improve governance and accountability, and was consistent with international evidence, and also with changes occurring in other human service areas (such as disability care or aspects of education) in which central departments increasingly took on the role of system managers while service provision was devolved to the relevant agencies.
Having embedded a much higher degree of joint governance into Australian health care, perhaps even irreversibly (given the opposition that arose to proposed changes in intergovernmental architecture), the question is now whether Australian governments, as well as the new organizations and stakeholders involved, can achieve the required and desired degree of local intergovernmental coordination, system integration and, ultimately, outcomes for patients.
At a system level, effective planning, priority setting, funding and incentives are required for joint functioning. On the ground, it is clear from the experience of the phn s to date that it is the state-managed lhn s that continue to dominate, bolstered as they are by a considerably larger resource base and local political influence, as well as the entrenched cultures, behaviour and community expectations around public hospital systems. Into the future, however, with an ageing and growing population and concerns over the sustainability of state health budgets, a continuing defence of state autonomy may come only at the expense of patient and community health outcomes.It is yet early days in the shift from autonomy to collaboration. The nhra has increased integration and functioning of cooperative federalism, but how durable this proves to be will depend among other things on whether the incentives are there to drive system integration, whether the necessary capacity-building occurs, and how strong the links are between Commonwealth and state policy making and administration.
References
Administrator, The (2017). 2016-17 Annual Report. Canberra: National Health Funding Pool.
aihw (2016). 25 Years of Health Expenditure in Australia: 1989-90 to 2013-14. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
aihw (2018). Health Expenditure Australia 2016-17. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
Anderson, Janet (2012). Health policy as contested terrain in the Australian federation, in Paul Kildea, Andrew Lynch and George Williams (eds), Tomorrow’s Federation: Reforming Australian Government. Leichhardt: FederationPress.
Banting, Keith (2005). Canada: nation-building in a federal welfare-state, in Herbert Obinger, Stephan Leibried and Francis G. Castles (eds), Federalism and the Welfare State: New World and European Experiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Banting, Keith G. and Stan Corbett (eds) (2002). Health Policy and Federalism: A Comparative Perspective on Multilevel Governance.
Montreal and Kingston: McGill- Queen’s University Press.Bennett, Christine C. (2009). A healthier future for all Australians: an overview of the final report of the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. Medical Journal of Australia 191:383-387.
Biggs, Amanda (2016). Hospital Funding. Canberra: Parliamentary Library.
Bismark, Marie M. and David M. Studdert (2014). Governance of quality of care: a qualitative study of health service boards in Victoria, Australia. BMJ Quality and Safety 23:474-482.
Bismark, Marie M. Simon J. Walter and David M. Studdert (2013). The role of boards in clinical governance: activities and attitudes among members of public health service boards in Victoria. Australian Health Review 37:682-687.
Boessenkool, Ken (2013). The future of the provincial role in Canadian health care federalism, in Katherine Fierlbeck and William Lahey (eds), Health Care Federalism in Canada: CriticalJunctures and Critical Perspectives. Montreal and Kingston: McGill- Queen’s University Press.
Boxall, Anne-Marie and Luke Buckmaster (2009). Options for Reforming Australia’s Health System. Canberra: Parliamentary Library.
Boychuk, Gerard W. (2008). National Health Insurance in the United States and Canada: Race, Territory, and the Roots of Difference. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Brown, Lynsey, Rachel Katterl, Petra Bywood et al. (2013). Medicare Locals: a model for primary health care integration? In PHCRIS Policy Issue Review. Adelaide: Primary Health Care Research and Information Service.
Commonwealth of Australia, and States and Territories (2011). National Health Reform Agreement.
Dardanelli, Paolo,John Kincaid, Alan Fenna et al. (2019). Dynamic de/centraliza- tion in federations: comparative conclusion, Publius: The Journal of Federalism 49:194-219.
Denis, Jean-Louis (2002). Governance and management of change in Canada’s health system, Discussion Papers. Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada.
Duckett, Stephen (2015). Australia, in Katherine Fierlbeck and Howard A. Palley (eds), Comparative Health Care Federalism. Abingdon: Routledge.
Eccleston, Richard (2008). Righting Australia’s vertical fiscal imbalance: transferring public hospital funding as an option for reform. Agenda 15:39-52.
Fenna, Alan (2008). Commonwealth fiscal power and Australian federalism. University of New South Wales Law Journal 31:509-529.
Fenna, Alan (2012). Federalism and intergovernmental coordination, in B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration (London: Sage).
Fenna, Alan (2019). The centralization of Australian federalism 1901-2010: measurement and interpretation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 49:30-56.
Fenna, Alan and Geoff Anderson (2012). The Rudd reforms and the future of Australian federalism, in Gabrielle Appleby, Nicholas Aroney and Thomas John (eds), The Future of Australian Federalism: Comparative and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.
Fierlbeck, Katherine and Howard A. Palley (eds) (2015a). Comparative Health Care Federalism. Farnham: Ashgate.
Fierlbeck, Katherine and Howard A. Palley (2015b). Canada, in Katherine Fierlbeck and Howard A. Palley (eds), Comparative Health Care Federalism. Farnham: Ashgate.
Gadiel, David and Jeremy Sammut (2012). How the NSWCoalition Should Govern Health: Strategies for Microeconomic Reform. Sydney: Centre for Independent Studies.
Gillespie, James (2010). Health reform: the opening shot. Inside Story. 9 Mar.,, accessed 11 Apr. 2019.
Graefe, Peter and Andrew Bourns (2009). The gradual defederalization of Canadian health policy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 39:187-209.
Gray, Gwendolyn (1991). Federalism and Health Policy: The Development of Health Systems in Canada and Australia. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Greer, Scott L. (2018). Health policy and territorial politics: disciplinary misunderstandings and directions for research, in Klaus Detterbeck and Eve Hepburn (eds), Handbook of Territorial Politics.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Haardt, David (2013a). Economic trends and challenges, in Katherine Fierlbeck and William Lahey (eds), Health Care Federalism in Canada: Critical Junctures and Critical Perspectives. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Haardt, David (2013b). The economics of health care federalism: what do we know? In Katherine Fierlbeck and William Lahey (eds), Health Care Federalism in Canada: CriticalJunctures and Critical Perspectives. Montreal and Kingston: McGill- Queen’s University Press.
Hall, Jane (2010). Designing the structure for Australia’s health system. Occasional Papers. Canberra: Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia.
Ham, Chris and Nicholas Timmins (2015). Managing Health Services through Devolved Governance: A Perspective from Victoria, Australia. London: The King’s Fund.
Health, Department of (2010). Three Major Reform Projects Responded to in 2010-11. Canberra: Australian Government.
Health, Department of (2018). Fact sheet: Primary Health Networks, Australian Government,.
hrscha, House of Representatives Standing Committee on Health and Ageing (2006). The Blame Game: Report on the Inquiry into Health Funding. Canberra: Parliament of Australia.
Javanparast, Sara, Fran Baum, Elsa Barton et al. (2015). Medicare Local—Local Health Network partnerships in South Australia: lessons for Primary Health Networks. Medicaljournal of Australia 203, pp. 2i9ei-2ige5.
Maioni, Antonia (1998). Parting at the Crossroads: The Emergence of Health Insurance in the United States and Canada. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Marchildon, Gregory P. (2018). Health care in Canada: interdependence and independence, in Gregory P. Marchildon and Thomas J. Bossert (eds), Federalism and Decentralization in Health Care: A Decision Space Approach. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
nca [National Commission of Audit] (2014). Towards Responsible Government. Canberra: Australian Government.
nhhrc (2009).
A Healthier Future for All Australians: Final Report of the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. Canberra: National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission.Nicholson, Caroline, Julie Hepworth, Letitia Burridge et al. (2018). Translating the elements of health governance for integrated care from theory to practice: a case study approach. International Journal of Integrated Care 18:1-13.
oecd (2014). Economic Survey: Australia. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Olson, Mancur (1969). The principle of ‘fiscal equivalence': the division of responsibilities among different levels of government. American Economic Review 59:479-487.
Painter, Martin (1998). Collaborative Federalism: Economic Reform in Australia in the 1990s. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.
Palley, Howard A. and Katherine Fierlbeck (2015). Conclusion, in Katherine Fierlbeck and Howard A. Palley (eds), Comparative Health Care Federalism. Farnham: Ashgate.
Peterson, Paul E. (1995). The Price of Federalism. Washington DC: Brookings Institution. Petrich, Mark, Vijaya L. Ramamurthy, Delia Hendrie and Suzanne Robinson (2013).
Challenges and opportunities for integration in health systems: an Australian perspective. Journal of Integrated Care 21:347-359.
Phillimore,John and Alan Fenna (2017). Intergovernmental councils and centralization in Australian federalism. Regional and Federal Studies 27:597-621.
Pineault, Raynald, Paul A. Lamarche, Frangois Champagne et al. (1993). The reform of the Quebec health care system: potential for innovation? Journal of Public Health Policy 14:198-219.
Podger, Andrew (2010). The case for increased commonwealth involvement in health. Proceedings of the Samuel Griffith Society 22:1-10.
Ramamurthy, Vijaya L. (2012a). Australian federalism and the use of tied grants: case studies of public hospitals and schools. Doctoral Dissertation, Curtin University.
Ramamurthy, Vijaya L. (2012b). Tied grants and policy reform in hospitals and schools, in Paul Kildea, Andrew Lynch and George Williams (eds), Tomorrow’s Federation: Reforming Australian Government. Leichhardt: FederationPress.
Robinson, Suzanne, Richard Varhol, Vijaya Ramamurthy et al. (2015). The Australian primary healthcare experiment: a national survey of Medicare Locals. BMJ Open 5:1-8.
Saunders, Carla and David J. Carter (2017). Is health systems integration being advanced through local health district planning? Australian Health Review 41:154-161.
Scotton, R. B. and C. R. Macdonald (1993). The Making of Medibank. Kensington: School of Health Services Management, University of New SouthWales.
Thompson, Jeremy (2011). Gillard hails ‘biggest change since Medicare'. ABC News. 11 Apr.
Treasury, Department of the (2009). Budget Paper No. 3: Australia’s Federal Relations 2009-10. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Veronesi, Gianluca, Kirsten Harley, Paul Dugdale and Stephanie D. Short (2014). Governance, transparency and alignment in the Council of Australian Governments (coag) 2011 National Health Reform Agreement. Australian Health Review 38:288-294.
Wanna, John (2010). Issues and agendas for the term, in Chris Aulich and Mark Evans (eds), The Rudd Government: Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007-2010. Canberra: anu Press.
Whitlam, Gough (1985). The Whitlam Government 1972-1975. Ringwood: Viking.
More on the topic Conclusion:
- Conclusion
- Conclusion
- CONCLUSION
- Conclusion
- Conclusion
- CONCLUSION
- 10 CONCLUSION
- Conclusion
- Conclusion
- Conclusion
- CONCLUSION
- 5.6 CONCLUSION
- 9.5 CONCLUSION
- Conclusion
- CONCLUSION
- Conclusion
- Conclusion
- Conclusion
- Conclusion
- Conclusion