<<
>>

Contents

Table of Legal Sources xi

Table of Ancient Non-Legal Sources xix

Introduction xx

1. Obligations: The Conceptual Map i

1. Definition: What is an Obligation? 2

2. Differentiation: Where do Obligations Fit in the Roman

View of the Law? 5

i.

The difference between rights in rem and in personam ii

ii. Differences between Gaius and Justinian i5

iii. Outside the institutional scheme i6

3. Internal Organisation: How Are Obligations Arranged? i6

i. The classification of obligations used by Gaius iy

ii. The classification of obligations in Stair 20

Part I. Contracts

2. The Organisation of Roman Contract 26

1. Arrangement of the List in Gaius’s and Justinian’s Institutes 3i

2. Formal and Informal Contracts 33

3. The Contract Litteris and the Role of Writing Generally 37

1. Justinian’s Contract Litteris 4i

2. The Role of Writing Outside Contracts Litteris 42

3. Arra 44

4. Writing and Stipulations 49

4. Contracts Verbis 52

1. Dotis Dictio (Declaration of Dowry) 52

2. Iusiurandum Liberti (Freedman’s Oath) 52

3. Stipulatio (Stipulation) 53

i. What was the formality? 53

ii. Why did stipulation not develop into a general law

of contract complete in itself ? 57

iii. What limits were there on the scope of stipulation? 59

iv. Special applications of stipulation 62

5. Contracts Consensu 65

1. Emptio-Venditio (Sale) 66

i. The demonstratio 67

ii. The intentio 78

iii. The action against the buyer 90

iv. Risk (periculum) 92

v. The passing of property 95

2. Locatio-Conductio (Hire) 97

i. The demonstratio 98

ii. The intentio 103

3. Societas (Partnership) iio

i. The demonstratio iii

ii. The intentio ii3

iii. The condemnatio ii8

4. Mandatum (Mandate, Commission or Agency) ii8

i. The demonstratio ii9

ii. The intentio i23

iii.

Special applications i26

6. Contracts Re i29

1. Mutuum (Loan for Consumption) i3i

2. Commodatum (Loan for Use) i35

i. The demonstratio i36

ii. The intentio i37

3. Depositum (Deposit) i42

i. The demonstratio i43

ii. The intentio i45

4. Pignus (Pledge) i46

i. The contract of pignus: the relationship between

pledgor and pledgee i49

ii. The relationship between pledgee and res i5i

Part II. Delicts

7. Furtum (Theft) i58

1. The Action i58

2. Paul’s Definition i59

3. The Intent i6i

4. The Act i65

i. What did contrectatio mean to the high classics? i66

ii. What did contrectatio mean to Justinian? i70

iii. Was there an earlier doctrine and nomenclature? i70

5. The Absence of Consent i74

bgcolor=white>5.
6. Liability for Helping I77
7· Claiming the Res i8o
8. A Variety of Penalties I82
8. Rapina (Robbery) i88
9. Damnum Iniuria Datum (Loss Wrongfully Caused) 192
I. The Shape of the Delict 192
2. The Statute 192
3. Interpretation in the Statutory Core I95
i. Has the plaintiff suffered loss (damnum)? I95
ii. Did that loss arise from a thing spoiled (res corrupta)? 196
iii. Did the spoiled thing belong to the plaintiff (res actoris)? I97
iv. Did the defendant do the spoiling �corpore suo’? 198
v.
Did the defendant do the harm wrongfully (iniuria)?
202
4. The Praetorian Periphery 2I0
i. Has the plaintiff suffered loss (damnum)? 2I0
ii. Did that loss arise from a thing spoiled (res corrupta)? 2I0
iii. Did the spoiled thing belong to the plaintiff (res actoris)? 2II
iv. Did the defendant do the spoiling �corpore suo’? 2I2
v. Did the defendant do the harm wrongfully (iniuria)? 2I2
5. The Measure of Recovery 2I5
i. Lis crescit (the suit enlarges) 2I5
ii. The original measure 2I6
iii. Full value under chapter III? 2I7
iv. The measure in high classical law 2I8
io. Iniuria (Contempt) 22I
I. The Name of the Delict 222
2. The Action 222
3. The Measure of Recovery 224
4. The Edictal Provisions 226
i.
Of convicium (shouted invective)
226
ii. Of affronts to sexual propriety 227
iii. �Let nothing be done to cause infamy’ 228
iv. The general edict de iniuriis 229
The Scope of the Classical Delict 230
6. The Classical Scope Re-Stated Summarily 234
7. Requirements in Relation to Intention 235
8. The History 237
i. The edictal phase 237
ii. The pre-edictal phase 240

9. Some Ancillary Features 243

i. Recollections in tranquillity 243

ii. A year to sue 243

iii. The counter-iudicium 244

iv. The lex Cornelia de iniuriis 244

v. Dependent persons 244

Part III. Miscellaneous Other Categories

11. The Quasi Categories 248

1. The Content of the Quasi Categories 250

2. The Ideas behind the Quasi Categories 258

Appendices

Extracts from Gaius's and Justinian's Institutes 264

Translated by the author

Questions 289

Further Publications by Peter Birks 296

Index 299

<< | >>
Source: Birks Peter. Roman Law of Obligations. Oxford University Press,2014. — 303 p.. 2014

More on the topic Contents:

  1. Contents
  2. CONTENTS
  3. Contents
  4. Contents
  5. Contents
  6. CONTENTS
  7. CONTENTS
  8. CONTENTS
  9. Contents
  10. Contents
  11. Contents
  12. Contents
  13. Table of Contents
  14. TABLE OF CONTENTS
  15. Table of Contents
  16. Table of Contents
  17. Album iudicum
  18. Online resources
  19. INTRODUCTION
  20. Online resources