Contents
Table of Legal Sources xi
Table of Ancient Non-Legal Sources xix
Introduction xx
1. Obligations: The Conceptual Map i
1. Definition: What is an Obligation? 2
2. Differentiation: Where do Obligations Fit in the Roman
View of the Law? 5
i.
The difference between rights in rem and in personam iiii. Differences between Gaius and Justinian i5
iii. Outside the institutional scheme i6
3. Internal Organisation: How Are Obligations Arranged? i6
i. The classification of obligations used by Gaius iy
ii. The classification of obligations in Stair 20
Part I. Contracts
2. The Organisation of Roman Contract 26
1. Arrangement of the List in Gaius’s and Justinian’s Institutes 3i
2. Formal and Informal Contracts 33
3. The Contract Litteris and the Role of Writing Generally 37
1. Justinian’s Contract Litteris 4i
2. The Role of Writing Outside Contracts Litteris 42
3. Arra 44
4. Writing and Stipulations 49
4. Contracts Verbis 52
1. Dotis Dictio (Declaration of Dowry) 52
2. Iusiurandum Liberti (Freedman’s Oath) 52
3. Stipulatio (Stipulation) 53
i. What was the formality? 53
ii. Why did stipulation not develop into a general law
of contract complete in itself ? 57
iii. What limits were there on the scope of stipulation? 59
iv. Special applications of stipulation 62
5. Contracts Consensu 65
1. Emptio-Venditio (Sale) 66
i. The demonstratio 67
ii. The intentio 78
iii. The action against the buyer 90
iv. Risk (periculum) 92
v. The passing of property 95
2. Locatio-Conductio (Hire) 97
i. The demonstratio 98
ii. The intentio 103
3. Societas (Partnership) iio
i. The demonstratio iii
ii. The intentio ii3
iii. The condemnatio ii8
4. Mandatum (Mandate, Commission or Agency) ii8
i. The demonstratio ii9
ii. The intentio i23
iii.
Special applications i266. Contracts Re i29
1. Mutuum (Loan for Consumption) i3i
2. Commodatum (Loan for Use) i35
i. The demonstratio i36
ii. The intentio i37
3. Depositum (Deposit) i42
i. The demonstratio i43
ii. The intentio i45
4. Pignus (Pledge) i46
i. The contract of pignus: the relationship between
pledgor and pledgee i49
ii. The relationship between pledgee and res i5i
Part II. Delicts
7. Furtum (Theft) i58
1. The Action i58
2. Paul’s Definition i59
3. The Intent i6i
4. The Act i65
i. What did contrectatio mean to the high classics? i66
ii. What did contrectatio mean to Justinian? i70
iii. Was there an earlier doctrine and nomenclature? i70
5. The Absence of Consent i74
| 6. | Liability for Helping | I77 |
| 7· | Claiming the Res | i8o |
| 8. | A Variety of Penalties | I82 |
| 8. Rapina (Robbery) | i88 | |
| 9. Damnum Iniuria Datum (Loss Wrongfully Caused) | 192 | |
| I. | The Shape of the Delict | 192 |
| 2. | The Statute | 192 |
| 3. | Interpretation in the Statutory Core | I95 |
| i. Has the plaintiff suffered loss (damnum)? | I95 | |
| ii. Did that loss arise from a thing spoiled (res corrupta)? | 196 | |
| iii. Did the spoiled thing belong to the plaintiff (res actoris)? | I97 | |
| iv. Did the defendant do the spoiling �corpore suo’? | 198 | |
| v. Did the defendant do the harm wrongfully (iniuria)? | 202 | |
| 4. | The Praetorian Periphery | 2I0 |
| i. Has the plaintiff suffered loss (damnum)? | 2I0 | |
| ii. Did that loss arise from a thing spoiled (res corrupta)? | 2I0 | |
| iii. Did the spoiled thing belong to the plaintiff (res actoris)? | 2II | |
| iv. Did the defendant do the spoiling �corpore suo’? | 2I2 | |
| v. Did the defendant do the harm wrongfully (iniuria)? | 2I2 | |
| 5. | The Measure of Recovery | 2I5 |
| i. Lis crescit (the suit enlarges) | 2I5 | |
| ii. The original measure | 2I6 | |
| iii. Full value under chapter III? | 2I7 | |
| iv. The measure in high classical law | 2I8 | |
| io. Iniuria (Contempt) | 22I | |
| I. | The Name of the Delict | 222 |
| 2. | The Action | 222 |
| 3. | The Measure of Recovery | 224 |
| 4. | The Edictal Provisions | 226 |
| i. Of convicium (shouted invective) | 226 | |
| ii. Of affronts to sexual propriety | 227 | |
| iii. �Let nothing be done to cause infamy’ | 228 | |
| iv. The general edict de iniuriis | 229 | |
| The Scope of the Classical Delict | 230 | |
| 6. | The Classical Scope Re-Stated Summarily | 234 |
| 7. | Requirements in Relation to Intention | 235 |
| 8. | The History | 237 |
| i. The edictal phase | 237 | |
| ii. The pre-edictal phase | 240 | |
9. Some Ancillary Features 243
i. Recollections in tranquillity 243
ii. A year to sue 243
iii. The counter-iudicium 244
iv. The lex Cornelia de iniuriis 244
v. Dependent persons 244
Part III. Miscellaneous Other Categories
11. The Quasi Categories 248
1. The Content of the Quasi Categories 250
2. The Ideas behind the Quasi Categories 258
Appendices
Extracts from Gaius's and Justinian's Institutes 264
Translated by the author
Questions 289
Further Publications by Peter Birks 296
Index 299
More on the topic Contents:
- Contents
- CONTENTS
- Contents
- Contents
- Contents
- CONTENTS
- CONTENTS
- CONTENTS
- Contents
- Contents
- Contents
- Contents
- Table of Contents
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Table of Contents
- Table of Contents
- Album iudicum
- Online resources
- INTRODUCTION
- Online resources