<<
>>

The earliest political units deserving to be called states were France, Spain, Portugal, Britain, the countries composing the Holy Roman Em­pire and Scandinavia, and the Netherlands.

During the first century or so of their existence all of these combined occupied only between 2 and 3 percent of the earth's surface: to be precise, 1,450,000 square miles out of a global land mass of 57,000,0000.

All other parts of the world continued to be inhabited, as they had been since time immemorial, by tribes without rulers, more or less centralized chiefdoms, and empires of various sizes and descriptions. Here and there, as along the East African coast and also in parts of what are today Malaysia and Indonesia, history points to the existence of city-states too sophisticated to be called chiefdoms and not subject to larger empires. However, there were apparently none that were run on nonproprietary, democratic lines like those of ancient Greece and Rome.

This much granted, the spread of the state into other continents and its victory over other polities may be studied in one of three ways. The first would be to proceed chronologically without regard to location: in other words, to follow the march first of imperialism and then of decolonization as it took place. The second would be to proceed geographically: i.e., divide the world into various regions and trace the way each one separate­ly came to be divided into, and ruled by, states. The third would be to look at the methods whereby states developed in regions outside Western Europe - whether by imitation, as in Japan from the middle of the nineteenth century on, or by conquest and subsequent liberation, as in most other places, or by some combination of the two. Insofar as those methods were largely dictated by the degree that civilization - including, not least, political civilization - had developed in each region before it was touched by the state, obviously these paths are interrelated. What follows here represents a compromise between all three.

<< | >>
Source: Creveld Martin van.. The Rise and Decline of the State. Cambridge University Press,1999. - 447 p.. 1999

More on the topic The earliest political units deserving to be called states were France, Spain, Portugal, Britain, the countries composing the Holy Roman Em­pire and Scandinavia, and the Netherlands.:

  1. GERMANY, BRITAIN AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE
  2. Atienza Manuel, Manero Juan Ruiz. A Theory of Legal Sentences. Springer Netherlands,1998. — 205 p., 1998
  3. Sovereignty and Autonomy of Constituent Units
  4. 4.4 AT TATE BRITAIN
  5. No concept is more central to political discourse and political analysis than that of the state.
  6. The History of Political Thought in the African Political Present
  7. PART 3 Challenges to the Autonomy of Federal Sub-units: The Policy Proble
  8. CHAPTER 4 Sovereignty and Autonomy of Constituent Units in Federal and Regional Systems
  9. Understanding the so-called shift from government to governance
  10. This chapter has as its subject what will, for simplicity, be called �the papyri’, though one or two inscriptions can profitably be considered at the same time.[147]
  11. NATION-STATES AND REGIONAL ORDERS
  12. The so-called ‘new institutionalism’ is a relatively recent addition to the pantheon of theories of the state and, like some of the other perspectives considered in this volume, it is by no means only a theory of the state
  13. Regional States
  14. NATION-STATES AND UNIVERSAL RIGHTS AFTER INDEPENDENCE
  15. The supremacy of Union law over the laws of the member states
  16. City-states
  17. Empires, States and Nation
  18. The subject called �obligations' is mostly about contract and delict. There are some other heads to be considered, but the right impression is given if we say that contract and delict between them occupy about ninety per cent of the ground.
  19. Roman Law Codes and the Roman Legal Tradition
  20. 1.4 HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT AND THE HISTORY OF THE POLITICAL