<<
>>

EDITORIAL BOAR

Gad Barzilai

University of Washington and Tel Aviv University

Paul Berman

University of Connecticut

Roger Cotterrell

University of London

Jennifer Culbert

Johns Hopkins University

Eve Darian-Smith

University of California

Santa Barbara

David Delaney

Amherst College

Florence Dore

Kent State University

David Engel

State University of New York at Buffalo

Anthony Farley

Boston College

David Garland

New York University

Jonathan Goldberg-Hiller

University of Hawaii

Laura Gomez

U.C.L.A.

Carol Greenhouse

Princeton University

Piyel Haldar

University of London

Thomas Hilbink

University of Massachusetts

Desmond Manderson

McGill University

Jennifer Mnookin

University of Virginia

Laura Beth Nielsen

American Bar Foundation

Paul Passavant

Hobart and William Smith

College

Susan Schmeiser

American University

Jonathan Simon

University of California Berkeley

Marianna Valverde

University of Toronto

Alison Young

University of Melbourne

<< | >>
Source: Anderson Matthew (ed.). Toward a Critique of Guilt: Perspectives from Law and the Humanities. JAI Press,2005. — 168 p.. 2005

More on the topic EDITORIAL BOAR:

  1. The Manuscript
  2. The new co-editor of the Savigny-Zeitschrift and member of the Akademie für Deutsches Recht
  3. Online resources
  4. CONTENTS
  5. TEXTBOOKS, MANUALS AND GENERAL PRESENTATIONS OF ROMAN LAW. HISTORY OF SOURCES
  6. ArthurBenz
  7. Reasoning by analogy
  8. Chapter One The Deflation of Reason
  9. From Graz to Leipzig (1897-1936)
  10. CHAPTER 5 (Still) in Search of the Federal Spirit
  11. Introduction
  12. Chapter Six Ramifications and Reckonings
  13. 5.9 Koschaker and Point 19 of the NSDAP program
  14. PART 3 Challenges to the Autonomy of Federal Sub-units: The Policy Proble
  15. The hallmarks of a good law essay
  16. PART I: (RE)THINKING LAW THROUGH LITERATUR
  17. Roman Law Terms with Letters Q
  18. CHAPTER 12 Concluding Remarks