<<
>>

Introduction

The evolution of Roman law largely took place within the institutional framework of the formulary procedure and the edictal system. The responses by the legal system to economic events were channelled through the struc­tural coupling of law and economy by means of contract.

Transactional ‘legal variants' provided inputs to the legal system and had the potential of trigger­ing legal change when they became the subject of litigation (section 2.2). The formulary procedure was much more sensitive to legal innovations than its predecessor, the legisactio procedure (section 2.3). By interpreting existing conditions of the conditional programmes encapsulated in the forms of action (formulae), or by incidentally changing or adding conditions, Roman law could respond to new transactional practices. For a substantial part of the classical period, the praetor's edict provided an effective mechanism of stabilizing legal innovations. As early as in the course of the Republic this resulted in the emergence of a second body of law alongside the ius civile: the ius honorarium (section 2.4). After the codification of the praetor's edict (Edictum perpetuum) under emperor Hadrian, the imperial chancery became the most important institutional agency for legal change, which resulted in a third body of law: ius novum. In particular, the Severan chan­cery sometimes curbed the spontaneous evolution of the law through con­tractual practices by placing limitations on party autonomy in order to protect debtors.

The intellectual framework for all these mechanisms of legal evolution was formed by Roman jurisprudence (section 2.5). The Roman jurists would be materially res ponsible for the content of the praetor's edict. They would introduce contractual innovations and in litigation they would advise the litigating parties, the praetor, and the iudex. The lines of evolution of Roman law are largely drawn by an iterative relationship between transactional law­yers (and later also practitioners without much legal training) drafting legal transactions and the jurists deploying their analytical skills and practical

Security and Credit in Roman Law: The historical evolution of pignus and hypotheca. Hendrik L. E. Verhagen,

Oxford University Press. © Hendrik L. E. Verhagen 2022. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199695836.003.0003 insights in order to accommodate new transactional practices into the Roman legal system.[154]

2.2

<< | >>
Source: Verhagen Hendrik L.. Security and Credit in Roman Law: The Historical Evolution of Pignus and Hypotheca. Oxford University Press,2022. — 448 p.. 2022

More on the topic Introduction:

  1. Domingo Rafael. Roman Law: An Introduction. Routledge,2018. — 252 p., 2018
  2. Chapter 1 Introduction
  3. Introduction: Themes and Literature
  4. Nicholas Barry, Metzger Ernest. An Introduction to Roman Law. Oxford University Press,1976. — 317 p., 1976
  5. Introduction
  6. INTRODUCTION
  7. Introduction
  8. Introduction
  9. Introduction
  10. Introduction
  11. INTRODUCTION
  12. Introduction
  13. Introduction
  14. INTRODUCTION
  15. INTRODUCTION
  16. INTRODUCTION
  17. Introduction