Unpacking the relationship between economic processes, discourse(s) and policy outcomes
In this section our aim is to examine the relationship between economic process(es), globalization discourse and policy outcomes. Our intention is to show that these relationships are highly complex and, as such, need to be unpacked.
More on the topic Unpacking the relationship between economic processes, discourse(s) and policy outcomes:
- Clausewitz’s aphorism—‘War is a continuation of politics by other means’—may be read as a policy prescription identifying the appropriate relationship between state authorities and institutions of violence.
- Domestic economic context
- The relationship between law and justice
- Economic transformation: the effects of globalization
- The relationship between constitutions and law
- International political, military and economic position
- DCAF as Policy Myth
- Elite governance at the sub-sectoral level: the case of policy networks
- DCAF as International Policy
- There appears to be a veritable industry of academic work on globalization, which reflects, in turn, the way in which this term has entered into common currency in the media and even in public discourse.
- 12 The Political Economy of Context: Theories of Economic Development and the Study of Conceptual Change
- No concept is more central to political discourse and political analysis than that of the state.
- PART 3 Challenges to the Autonomy of Federal Sub-units: The Policy Proble
- CHAPTER 3 Beyond National Policymaking: Conceptions of Myth in Interpretive Policy Analysis and Their Value for IR
- Introductory texts on feminism and politics frequently start by noting the difficult relationship between feminist approaches and political science (Phillips 1998; Randall 2002).
- ‘Family’, ‘homecoming’, ‘growing together’—in trying to reconstruct how European identity was discursively imagined in Germany’s EU enlargement discourse during the 1990s, Hulsse (2006) argues that metaphors like these primordialise Europe and establish a binary opposition between insiders and outsiders.