<<
>>

The language of public debate on international issues is filled with appeals to and invocations of the international community.1

Even though the term is in ubiquitous use, this pervasiveness has not rendered it devalued. On the contrary, not only has it become an idea of high currency, but more and more power is accorded to it.

The international community is able to organise humanitarian action, end suffering, denounce violence, and even build states. According to this narrative, it acts for the sake of order, eco­nomic development, and poverty reduction. We may thus infer that the international community not only has agency but is, in fact, exception­ally powerful. Yet despite the international community being presented as possessing agency, obligations, and power, contemporary International Relations literature generally stops short of discussing the role and func­tions the idea acquires through its discursive uses. Surely, the potency of the international community is not sustained by any concrete material factor, such as nuclear weapons. Its authority rather stems from the usage

International Politics, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-53752-2_11 of this special term and values attached to it. Yet since ideas have real-life consequences, questioning the international community becomes a task of perennial importance.

This chapter engages with the uses of the idea of international commu­nity in policy discourse produced in the area of development cooperation, with particular focus on international statebuilding. I argue that for policy practitioners the idea of international community has become a narrative that not simply helps make sense of experience but provides significance, inspires people, and guides action. The way the idea of international com­munity is used and produced through discourse allows claiming that it performs functions ascribed by literature to political myths. The myth of international community motivates actors in their statebuilding endeav­our, sanctions a particular model of the state, and allows for presenting statebuilding as necessary and good rather than interventionist.

Moreover, actors undertake particular activities on the assumption that societal ele­ments do exist between them. Under such conditions, statebuilding becomes not only the natural order of things but also the ‘glue’ binding elements of the imagined international community together.

I follow Chiara Bottici’s exploration of political myths. Rather than approaching political myth as an object, Bottici proposes a relational and phenomenological approach to myths, placing emphasis on social pro­cesses accompanying their production and influencing their popularity. A myth, according to this approach, is best described as a ‘process of con­tinual work that responds to a perpetually changing need for significance’ (Bottici 2007: 132). The narrative dimension is key to myths, as it allows reducing the complexity of social life, thus facilitating comprehension. Political myths are not any kind of narrative; they are specific in that they are believed to be true or acted upon as if they were true. Political myths perform a number of functions. They provide a sense of cohe­siveness, define common purpose, and grant stimulus for action. In that way, political myths play an important role in shaping collective identity (Bottici 2007).

The chapter presents the results of a textual and discourse analysis of policy documents, speeches, and interviews, with special focus on dis­course produced by national and international organisations and practi­tioners in the field of statebuilding. It approaches talk and text as social action and thereby language as constructive and performative (Johnstone 2001; Neumann 2008; Willig 2008). Policy documents selected for the purpose of this study were those authored by key actors or agenda-setters in development cooperation. Arguments are illustrated with examples of statebuilding practices in Central Asia, in particular, in Kyrgyzstan, where fieldwork took place.

The chapter develops its argument in several steps. Opening with a brief overview of literature engaging with the idea of international com­munity, it proceeds with the analysis of discursive uses of the idea in the political practice of development cooperation, with special reference to statebuilding.

It illustrates how the idea of international community is subject to reification, first, as an international arrangement existing ‘out there’, and second, as an entity in possession of agency. The international community is agential when it is equated with international aid donors, but discourse produced by donors at the same time upholds the vision of a universal international community, which should be valued and pro­tected.2 Reification and agentification are components of the continual ‘work on’ a common narrative through which statebuilding practitioners provide significance to their specific political conditions. The final part of the chapter summarizes the features and workings of the international community as a political myth.

<< | >>
Source: Bliesemann de Guevara Berit. Myth and Narrative in International Politics. Palgrave Macmillan,2016. — 329 p.. 2016

More on the topic The language of public debate on international issues is filled with appeals to and invocations of the international community.1:

  1. Ideas in Action: The International Community and International Statebuilding
  2. The International Community as Studied
  3. Elite governance at the international level - the epistemic community approach
  4. The International Community as a Political Myth
  5. CHAPTER 11 The Powerful Myth of the International Community and the Imperative to Build States
  6. 5.4 IMPLICATIONS FOR DOMESTIC PUBLIC LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
  7. Although new work on women's contributions is on the horizon, international lawyers have written relatively little history of their discipline from a gender perspective, whether on legal subjects or actors in international law, or on gender relations as a way of signifying or structuring legal power.
  8. This is a book about history: the ‘historical turn' in international law on the one hand, and the ‘international turn' in the history of political thought on the other.
  9. CITIZENSHIP AND INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATION: GENDER DISCRIMINATION AND RELATIONAL FEMINISM
  10. 10.5 THINKING THROUGH THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION
  11. International political, military and economic position
  12. 10.1 LAW AND THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION
  13. INTERNATIONAL CRISIS AND TRANSNATIONAL EVERYDAY: GENDER RELATIONS AS CHANGES OF STATE
  14. INTERNATIONAL LEGAL HISTORY: A TALE OF TWO STYLES
  15. Myths are part and parcel of contemporary international politics,
  16. 2.3 HISTORIES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
  17. Bliesemann de Guevara Berit. Myth and Narrative in International Politics. Palgrave Macmillan,2016. — 329 p., 2016
  18. DCAF as International Policy