<<
>>

First impressions

Whenever people meet other people for the first time, they make judgments about them very quickly. First impressions really do count, as people evaluate you by your dress, appearance and body language in a matter of minutes.

As the saying known by all sales people goes: you only get one chance to make a first impression. If your oral presentation is made in a small group session your audience will, for better or worse, already have an impression of you and will not usually expect you to dress up for the occasion. If you are taking part in a moot, the audience may expect you to dress in formal attire, such as a dark suit; and even if they do not expect this, the judge will. The three key things are to:

bull.jpg be sensitive to the occasion;

bull.jpg dress appropriately; and, above all,

bull.jpg remember that the audience begins evaluating you as soon as they see you.

An oral presentation involves direct face-to-face communication; your words are delivered in person, rather than through the medium of the written word. It is therefore an essential part of the exercise that you will be assessed (formally or informally) not only on what you say, but also on how you say it. Your audience will judge your delivery by the way you use your voice, maintain eye contact, and use body language such as posture and gestures. Behaviour such as standing with your hands in your pockets, or fiddling with jewellery, will project the wrong image.

<< | >>
Source: Askey Simon, McLeod Ian. Studying Law. Macmillan Education,2014. — 239 p.. 2014

More on the topic First impressions:

  1. Non-verbal communication
  2. Notes
  3. ArthurBenz
  4. Introduction
  5. INTRODUCTION
  6. The Contract Litteris and the Role of Writing Generally
  7. CHAPTER 5 (Still) in Search of the Federal Spirit
  8. Having studied this chapter you should be able to:
  9. A structural approach to the distinction
  10. The Statute
  11. PART 3 Challenges to the Autonomy of Federal Sub-units: The Policy Proble
  12. Introduction
  13. 1.1. The pragmatic irrelevance of permissive norms. The category of 'per­missive norms' is unnecessary. Echave-Urquijo-Guibourg (1980) and Ross (1968)
  14. CHAPTER III. THE SLAVE AS RES (cont.). SALE OF SLAVES.
  15. CHAPTER 12 Concluding Remarks
  16. Introduction
  17. 1 Studying Law: What’s It All About?
  18. APPENDIX V. MANUMISSION VINDICTA BY A FILIUSFAMILIAS.
  19. Developments in contemporary pluralism
  20. Analytical Dimension 2: Myths as Different Forms of Narrative