<<
>>

The school of natural law

A school of thought contemporary with the usus modernus was the so-called school of natural law. Founded by Hugo Grotius and influenced by Greek philosophy and Protestant rationalism, the school of modern natural law defended the existence of valid rational legal principles inherent in the nature of human beings.

Natural law scholars tried to find these absolute legal prin­ciples, emancipated from faith and creeds and confessions, in the writings and statements of antiquity, especially in Roman law. They understood law as a sort of legal mathematics. While they drew on Roman law to support natural law, for them natural law was not Roman law. Rather, natural law scholars’ interest in Roman law lay in the fact that it provided good materials to build their own abstract and logical system of natural law. They rejected Roman legal formalism, and they did not pay special attention to philological and historical developments. Although the new natural law was not really a pro­duct of Roman law, many principles of Roman law survived in European jurisprudence as natural-law principles. Major legal problems within interna­tional relations of that time provided the best occasion for applying natural law theory to the field of international law. The new international law became the most exquisite product of the natural law school.

Distinguished scholars of the school of natural law were Samuel Pufendorf (1632-94), Christian Thomasius (1655-1728), and Christian Wolf (1679-1754). Of these three natural law scholars, the most original was Pufendorf. He was the first to develop a general theory of natural law emphasizing natural duties more than natural rights. Although Pufendorf used Roman categories, he replaced the Roman systematization of persons, things, and actions by three categories of human duties: to God, to the agent himself, and to others. Pufendorf always maintained the Christian character of natural law: although natural, it is deduced from the Christian principle of loving God and others as oneself. Pufendorf’s significance in the development of European private law is enormous. The structures of later codifications, especially the “general part” (Allgemeiner Teil) of the codes and systematizations of contracts, were inspired by the doctrines of Pufendorf. His most important works are: Elementa jurisprudentia universalis [Elements of a universal jurisprudence, 1660], De jure naturae et gentium [On the law of nature and nations, 1672], and De officio hominis et civis iuxta legem naturalem [On the duty of man and citizen according to natural law, 1673].

The school of natural law triggered and thoroughly influenced the codification movement of the eighteenth century. Even in England and Scotland, where there was no substantial codification, the school of natural law influenced the modern law of contracts and negligence.

<< | >>
Source: Domingo Rafael. Roman Law: An Introduction. Routledge,2018. — 252 p.. 2018

More on the topic The school of natural law:

  1. The School of Natural Law
  2. The Sceptic as Natural Law Adherent?
  3. 5.11 Juristenrecht and relative natural law
  4. The school of pandectists and the German Civil Code
  5. The German historical school
  6. 6. ORIGINAL NATURAL MODES
  7. Civil, praetorian, and natural obligations
  8. CHAPTER 3 Is Federalism Natural?
  9. 2.1. Permission and the regulation of 'natural' conduct
  10. The law of obligations is one of the most significant contributions of Roman law to legal culture, illuminating the civil law tradition more than any other branch of Roman law.
  11. Roman private law developed from the law of procedure, otherwise recognized as the law relating to actions.
  12. Roman law and English law
  13. Resolving conflicts between English law and European Union law
  14. Mousourakis G.. Roman Law and the Origins of the Civil Law Tradition. Springer,2015. — 339 p., 2015
  15. Common law, equity, statute law and delegated legislation
  16. The second branch of the threefold division of all of private law which Gaius employs in his Institutes is that of the law of 'things'.
  17. Along with contracts, the other significant branch of the law of obligations is that of delicts, i.e., private wrongs for which redress was provided by civil law.
  18. 5.4 IMPLICATIONS FOR DOMESTIC PUBLIC LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW