ABSTRACT
None of the standard theories of punishment can explain the “remorse discount” juries and judges seem inclined to give when sentencing. This chapter argues that sentencing ought to change its nature when a defendant is remorseful sanctioning instead of punishing The emotion of remorse is so closely tied to retribution that there is no further need for punishment Instead a merciful settlement or sanction is required to bring an end to the retributive pain of remorse In short for remorseful defendants we sentence in order to mitigate remorse rather than looking to remorse in order to mitigate sentence
More on the topic ABSTRACT:
- ABSTRACT
- ABSTRACT
- ABSTRACT
- ABSTRACT
- ABSTRACT
- ABSTRACT
- List of Figures
- Definitions of the state have varied widely.
- The main Roman delicts divide the field in this way: furtum and damnum iniuria datum have to do with wealth.
- Forms of state failure
- For students of politics, the state has always assumed central importance.