<<
>>

ABSTRACT

This chapter argues that Albert Camus’s post-World War II novella The Fall narrates a bridge of complicity between medicine and law, implicat­ing both professions in the Nazi formulation of race. Rather than reading the work as a broadly construed allegory of the Holocaust, it situates Camus’s text within the framework of the Nuremberg trials and their judgment of perpetrators in professional rather than in wide-ranging moral terms The essay concludes by examining Camus's use of the sub­junctive, which posits juridical force as the act of imagining alternatives to the past, and using these alternative scenarios as a basis for judgment.

<< | >>
Source: Anderson Matthew (ed.). Toward a Critique of Guilt: Perspectives from Law and the Humanities. JAI Press,2005. — 168 p.. 2005

More on the topic ABSTRACT:

  1. ABSTRACT
  2. ABSTRACT
  3. ABSTRACT
  4. ABSTRACT
  5. ABSTRACT
  6. ABSTRACT
  7. List of Figures
  8. Definitions of the state have varied widely.
  9. The main Roman delicts divide the field in this way: furtum and damnum iniuria datum have to do with wealth.
  10. Forms of state failure
  11. For students of politics, the state has always assumed central importance.
  12. Growing out of feudalism and harking back to Roman imperial times, the system of government that appeared in Europe during the years 1337­-1648 was still, in most respects, entirely personal.
  13. ILLUSORY INTERDISCIPLINARITY
  14. The idea of ‘global governance’ is now firmly established in political sci­ence and practice.