Persona, caput, and status
The Roman idea of person (persona) was distinct from the idea of an individual (or entity) with legal capacity. Originally, persona meant a mask, i.e., a character in a theatrical performance.
By extension, it referred to the role played in life by an individual, and by metonymy to the human being as such playing his or her role in society. Persons (personae) included all individuals, whether or not they were rights-bearers. So slaves were persons (see Gaius 1.121; 2.187; 3.189), even though legally they were considered objects (res corporales).Synonymous with the person was the head, caput - caput thus being used as synecdoche, as a part representing the whole person. But caput also was a technical term, especially in the expression capitis deminutio. Originally, capitis deminutio meant a reduction in the size of a group by the loss of one of its members. Thus, when a Roman citizen lost citizenship, the Roman People was diminished; or when a son was adopted, the biological family was diminished. Later, the term came to signify a lowering of personal status owing to a change in family identity (capitis deminutio minima), loss of citizenship (capitis deminutio media), or loss of freedom (capitis deminitio maxima). In general, a persons status denoted his or her legal position with respect to the household (familia) and the people of Rome. The main factors determining an individuals legal status were citizenship and social rank.
The most fundamental division in the law of persons was that between free persons and slaves (Gaius 1.9). Next came the divide between Roman citizens and foreigners or strangers (peregrini), which made room for the intermediate and particularly favorable legal status of Latini. Finally, there was the divide between those who were independent (sui iuris) and those who were submitted to a paterfamilias (alieni iuris).
The social distinction between the upper classes of Roman society (honestiores: the more honorable) and the lower classes (humiliores: the more lowly) acquired legal relevance during the Principate. Honestiores included members of the Senate and their families, equestrians (equites), local magistrates (decuriones), and military veterans. All others were humiliores - a category that included freeborn persons below the status of local magistrates and freed people (libertini). Although never defined technically, some legal differences between honestiores and humiliores appeared in private law and, especially, in criminal law. The most humiliating and degradingFamily law 129 punishments (capital punishment by crucifixion or by exposure to wild beasts, torture, and corporal punishment, among others) were applicable only to lower classes. Where humiliores were punished by capital death, honestiores were only sent into exile; where humiliores were punished with forced labor (deportatio) or even death for a certain crime, honestiores were only punished with temporary expulsion to an island along with confiscation of their property (relegatio).
More on the topic Persona, caput, and status:
- Status lay at the heart of the law of persons. As Rome developed into a highly stratified society, the different gradations of status were reflected in a myriad of detailed rules.
- 4.2 Status
- Status Civitatis
- The Roman law of persons was concerned with the status or legal position of the human being.
- The status of Convention rights in English law
- Status Familiae
- The status of textbooks and journals
- CHAPTER II THE LAW OF STATUS
- Status, pay, the “decline of oratory”, and terminology
- Status Libertatis
- Status, Slavery, and Citizenship