Introductory
Roman private law was closely connected with the law of civil procedure, otherwise recognized as the law relating to actions. In a sense, the law of actions may be construed as the most important part of the law.
This mainly derives from the fact that the early jurists, the shapers of the ius civile, were concerned not so much with the formulation of general principles regarding the rights and duties of individuals, but with establishing the factual circumstances under which an aggrieved person should be granted a legal remedy. In other words, unlike modern lawyers, who tend to emphasize rights and duties, and regard remedies as merely their procedural shell, the Roman jurists attached significance to remedies rather than to rights, to forms of action rather than to causes of action. Thus, the law as a whole had little import for the Romans unless a recognized form of action existed whereby an individual could enforce a claim. As the evolution of Roman private law was greatly influenced by the development of legal procedure, the study of procedural law can illuminate the framework that cultivated substantive private law.As noted previously, the early Romans used the term ius to denote a right or a form of conduct approved by the community. Before the formation of the state there was no comprehensive system of rules or remedies designed to assist an aggrieved person with the enforcement of his rights. The obvious course for an aggrieved person was self-help, for example, by forcibly evicting a trespasser or reclaiming property he was wrongly deprived of by another person. A general awareness existed of the circumstances where such demonstrations of hostile power were iura and this was established by custom. The development of the state was accompanied by the formation of rules that required the person aspiring to wield self-help to show actual infringement of his rights, and establishing this proof often necessitated a judicial decision.
Only then was the wronged party allowed to execute the decision by means of self-help. The holder of imperium had a principal function of declaring the ius or identifying rights. In the earliest times, this function of identifying the ius was probably undifferentiated from the magistrate’s otherG. Mousourakis, Fundamentals of Roman Private Law, 309
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-29311-5_6, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012 functions. The exercise of his power to issue commands, that could be drastically enforced, assisted the aggrieved party in obtaining the ius that was declared as their entitlement. Therefore, if a person possessed or claimed a ius against another and secured that person's appearance before the magistrate, he could have both his ius confirmed and its exercise protected by the suppression of any resistance. Initially, the magistrate's law-finding activity must have been a relatively simple task as the circumstances where a ius was recognized were mainly presumed. But as social and economic conditions changed, magistrates were confronted with unfamiliar claims and forms of ius. We may surmise that they denied support for such cases, unless the new ius was adapted to resemble a recognized form. In the course of time, a more sophisticated system of rules and principles developed to provide remedies for a variety of infringements on the rights of Roman citizens.
The Roman law of procedure is generally distinguished by three stages of development: the period of the legis actio procedure, the period of the formulary system and the period of the cognitio extraordinaria. The legis actio procedure was used during the Republic; the formulary system featured in the second century BC to the third century AD; and the cognitio extraordinaria prevailed during the Empire.
6.2
More on the topic Introductory:
- Introductory
- Introductory
- Introductory
- Introductory
- Introductory
- Introductory
- Introductory
- Introductory
- Introductory
- Introductory
- Introductory
- Introductory
- INTRODUCTORY
- Introductory
- Introductory
- INTRODUCTORY
- Introductory
- Introductory
- INTRODUCTORY NOTE
- Introductory remarks