<<
>>

A fourth category of obligations referred to in the Institutes of Justinian are the obligations arising from quasi-delicts (obligationes quasi ex delicto or quasi ex maleficio).

The term quasi-delictum denoted a wrongful act that did not qualify as a delictum but which nevertheless engendered an obligation between the aggrieved person and the actor, even though the latter may not in fact be blame­worthy.[986] Justinian enumerates four kinds of wrongdoing under the heading of quasi-delicts, of which the last three appear to have related to vicarious liability.

4.11.1     

<< | >>
Source: Mousourakis G.. Fundamentals of Roman Private Law. Springer, 2012.— 366 p.. 2012

More on the topic A fourth category of obligations referred to in the Institutes of Justinian are the obligations arising from quasi-delicts (obligationes quasi ex delicto or quasi ex maleficio).:

  1. Quasi-contractual and quasi-delictual obligations
  2. Quasi delicts
  3. ‘Quasi-contract’ is an unsatisfactory term applied to certain specific obligations which did not arise from contract or delict but were legally enforceable.
  4. 1. The fate of the Roman quasi-delicts
  5. Quasi-Delicts
  6. Obligations Arising from Delicts
  7. The Content of the Quasi Categories
  8. III. QUASI-CONTRACT
  9. Quasi-contract
  10. Quasi contracts
  11. Obligations: Common Principles and Obligations Arising from Contracts
  12. The Ideas behind the Quasi Categories
  13. QUASI-DELICT
  14. Quasi-deiict
  15. Other Quasi-Contractual Condictiones
  16. Delictual and quasi-delictual liability