Divisions of Roman Legal and Constitutional History
The history of Roman law may be divided into periods in different ways, depending on the nature of the developments taken to provide the requisite historical landmarks.
Although these divisions have facilitated the study of Roman law, one must bear in mind that Roman law evolved gradually and therefore no clear-cut lines separate the different stages of its development. The sources of Roman law were, in varying degrees of strength from period to period, all present and in force at one and the same time, and in various ways qualified the influence of each other.In general, Roman history falls into three major periods that correspond to Rome's three successive systems of political organisation:
(i) The Monarchy - from the founding of Rome in the eighth century BC to the end of the sixth century BC.
(ii) The Republic - from the end of the sixth century BC to the battle of Actium in 31 BC, or the transformation of the Roman constitution under Augustus in 27 BC. The republican era is subdivided into two phases: the early Republic (509 BC to 367 BC), and the later Republic (from 367 BC to 31 or 27 BC).
(iii) The Empire - this period begins in 31 or 27 BC and ends, for the western Roman empire in 476 AD with the overthrow of the last emperor of the West, and for the eastern Roman empire in 565 AD with the death of Emperor Justinian. The imperial era is subdivided into two parts: the Principate (from 31 or 27 BC to 284 AD), and the Dominate (from 284 AD to 476 AD for the western empire and to 565 AD for the eastern empire).
According to one approach, Roman legal history follows these divisions as the various legal institutions adapted themselves to the type of government in power.
Roman legal history may also be divided into periods by reference to the modes of law-making and the character of the legal institutions that came to prevail in different epochs. In this respect, the history of Roman law may be divided, roughly, into four phases:
(i) The archaic period - from the eighth century BC to the third century BC.
This period includes the Monarchy and the earlier part of the Republic.(ii) The pre-classical period - from the third century BC to the beginning of the Principate in the first century AD. This phase covers the later Republic and the early years of the Principate.
(iii) The classical period - from the first century AD to the middle of the third century AD.
(iv) The post-classical period - from the middle of the third century AD to the middle of the sixth century AD. This period covers the later part of the Principate and the Dominate.
The above divisions will provide a suitable framework for the discussion of Roman legal histoiy as presented in this book. Before we proceed to examine the development of Roman society and its law in some detail, an outline of the general features of each historical period will be offered in the following paragraphs.
More on the topic Divisions of Roman Legal and Constitutional History:
- Divisions of Roman Constitutional and Legal History
- Divisions of Roman Legal History
- It is difficult to provide a comprehensive and finite list of the sources of Roman law, since the Roman jurists never defined the term 'source of law' and different sources were emphasized at certain periods in the history of the Roman legal system to reflect their prominence as instruments of legal reform.
- The history of Rome is traditionally divided into three main periods based on the dominant constitutional structure in Roman society during these three periods.
- Sources of Roman Legal History
- Schulz F.. History of Roman legal science. Oxford University Press,1946. — 375 p., 1946
- V. ROMAN LAW AS LEGAL HISTORY
- The history of legal procedures is hardly less than the history of the legal system itself.
- IV. HISTORICAL LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP AND LEGAL HISTORY
- Constitutional background of Roman law
- Although new work on women's contributions is on the horizon, international lawyers have written relatively little history of their discipline from a gender perspective, whether on legal subjects or actors in international law, or on gender relations as a way of signifying or structuring legal power.
- INTERNATIONAL LEGAL HISTORY: A TALE OF TWO STYLES
- Chapter 1 The Historical and Constitutional Context of Roman Law: A Brief Overview
- 3.6 The affair of the Institute for Ancient Near Eastern Legal history