<<
>>

NATIONAL FEELINGS

No matter how strongly scholars disagreed about the merits of native vs. Roman law, their contest would not have been so dra­matic if other, unacademic, i.e. political, considerations had not been involved.

The quarrel was so violent because it concerned political feelings. It was all about the very touchy issue of na­tional against foreign law: what could have been more burning in the young, proud nation state? National pride, the ethnic in­terpretation of history and the romantic Volksgeist theory formed a potent current from the late eighteenth century onwards. It was opposed to the rational cosmopolitanism of the Enlighten­ment. Moser, Herder and Hegel come to mind in Germany, and in France Montesquieu believed that the French aristocracy, to which he belonged, descended from superior Frankish warriors, whereas the peasants proceeded from the vanquished inhabi­tants of Roman Gaul. And although the gemeines Recht had been predominant in Germany for a long time, the old native tradition was far from extinct, particularly in Saxony, an ancient princi­pality which became a kingdom in Napoleonic times: Saxon law was partially accepted as a subsidiary norm (gemeines Sachsenrecht) right up to the BUrgerliches Gesetzbuch.[120] So both camps could legitimately appeal to the past.

<< | >>
Source: Caenegem R.C. van.. European Law in The Past and The Future: Unity and Diversity over Two Millennia. Cambridge University Press,2004. — 185 p.. 2004

More on the topic NATIONAL FEELINGS:

  1. NATIONAL FEELINGS
  2. 3. DIFFERENT RATIONALIZATIONS IN THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS
  3. Caenegem R.C. van.. European Law in The Past and The Future: Unity and Diversity over Two Millennia. Cambridge University Press,2004. — 185 p., 2004
  4. 2. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
  5. Conclusion
  6. Lawyers’ Self-image and Remuneration
  7. Conclusion
  8. RECONCILIATION
  9. 5.13 Intractable Conflicts
  10. Lawyers’ Self-image as Professionals