Memory and Commemoration
Public, often contentious exchanges about slavery are not unique to the United States and did not happen in isolation. Caribbean countries have been commemorating slavery in public spaces since at least the 1960s through the construction of monuments honoring enslaved rebels such as Cuffy and Carlota.
Mexico and Colombia have honored slave insurgents such as Bioho and Yanga for many years as well. Starting in 1888 and for nearly fifty years, Brazil had observed May 13, the date of the abolition of slavery, as a national holiday. Though this holiday was suppressed in the 1930s, since the end of the Cold War, dozens of cities around the country have adopted November 20, the date of the death of Zumbi, the leader of Palmares, as a national day to celebrate Black consciousness.During most of the twenty-first century, Brazilian governments have passed legislation and promoted initiatives to recognize the history of slavery and the country’s long-lasting connections with the African continent. In recent years, however, fascist Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro has claimed that the Portuguese never set foot in Africa and that therefore Brazil had no responsibility for the enslavement of Africans. Such positions show that, although the history of slavery and the role of the country in the Atlantic slave trade has long been documented and established, publicly elected authorities can at any time decide to make false claims about their country’s history. These attacks confirm not only that historians must revisit and reilluminate this past but also that they need to engage in public debates taking place outside academic settings.
Since 2006, France has acknowledged its past involvement in the Atlantic slave trade and slavery on May 10, a national day commemorating the memories of the slave trade, slavery, and their abolition.
In this climate, new debates about the need for reparations for slavery also reemerged, especially after 2014 when the Caribbean Community and Common Market (CARICOM), an organization comprising fifteen member states, released a ten-point plan demanding that European countries offer formal apologies and reparations for slavery, the Atlantic slave trade, and colonialism. CARICOM’s call for redress was followed by heated discussions in the United States and European countries, showing slavery’s continuing significance in today’s world.8In previous works, I have explored the reasons this new interest has surfaced in recent years, and I have especially sought to explain why and how the Atlantic slave trade and slavery are memorialized in Europe, Africa, and the Americas.9 I have argued that this relevance has little to do with what happened in the past but is rather related to how racism and present-day social and racial inequalities perpetuate the exclusion of people labeled as Black in societies where chattel slavery existed. Because racism and white supremacy persist in Europe, Africa, and the Americas as legacies of Atlantic slavery, this long and painful past still matters. But the excessive focus on the present can also blur our ability to clearly address the study of chattel slavery and the Atlantic slave trade.
More on the topic Memory and Commemoration:
- Memory and Commemoration
- Araujo Ana Lucia. Humans in Shackles: An Atlantic History of Slavery. University of Chicago Press,2024. — 1702 р., 2024
- BIBLIOGRAPHY