CONCLUSION
This article examines the backgrounds of oral proceeding initiatives in the Korean judiciary, the road-map of their progress to reach stated goals, and their detailed strategies and plans.
Oral proceedings initiatives seem to constiÂtute a motto that urges us to follow one of the legal principles. However, it is also an effort to recover the public trust in the judiciary through the reform of court proceedings. It has been about a year and a half since we started to implement oral proceedings in our court system. At this point, belief that we are in need of a stronger oral proceedings system has been widespread among members of the legal community. Yet we are still in need of more guidelines, a detailed manual, and the development of supporting programs and facilities.From now on, we have to develop action plans to implement oral proceedÂings in actual situations rather than reiterate principles of oral proceeding or develop abstract civil procedure models.
3.
Source:
Cho Kuk. Litigation in Korea. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited,2010. — 257 p.. 2010
More on the topic CONCLUSION:
- Conclusion
- Frison Christine. Redesigning the Global Seed Commons: Law and Policy for Agrobiodiversity and Food Security. Routledge,2019. — 294 p., 2019
- Conclusions
- CHAPTER 12 Concluding Remarks
- Ni Kuei-Jung, Lin Ching-Fu (eds.). Food Safety and Technology Governance. Routledge,2022. — 252 p., 2022
- 14 Gender and the Lost Private Side of International Law
- An Expansive Protection of the Law
- PART III Reflection
- Conventional sequestration
- Impossibilium nulla obligatio est under the (earlier) ius commune