<<
>>

2. Non-White Farmers

The modern farm system also excludes almost anyone who is not a landowning white farmer. European settlers took land from the Native Americans and eventually forced them onto reservations.

Even after that, the federal government mandated the sale of reservation land to non-Native Americans when tribal lands were deemed to be “surplus” or when the landowner was deemed not “competent” to hold property. Native Americans lost roughly

27

80 million acres in this way between 1871 and 1928.66 By 1910, freed Black people and their descendants had acquired at least 16 million acres of land, almost all of it in the South.67 Through a variety of means, white families, often with federal assistance, deprived them of almost all of their acreage,68 so that by 2012 there were only about 300 Black commercial farmers, or about 0.2% of the total.69 Black farmers’ lost wealth and income since 1910 would be worth hundreds of billions of dollars today according to recent estimates.70 Federal and state governments passed a series of laws in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that barred Asians from owning land. Many Japanese American farmers who had been interned in camps during World War II returned to their farms to find white farmers had stolen them.71

Because of this and other widespread discrimination in landownership and agriculture, almost all farmers are white. USDA also still discriminates against Black and other non-white farmers on a systemic basis. For example, more than 99% of the 2019 tariff bail out, the single largest farm subsidy that year, went to white farmers.72 These payments further entrench the positions of those who received them.

Many non-white farmers have responded to this system by working toward reform. Black farmer groups have led numerous campaigns against discrimination at USDA, often connecting their problems with the problems of department employees who have protested harassment, abuse, and mismanagement within USDA itself. Black farmers have also led campaigns in regions throughout the South to prevent the construction of concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) and to support safer modes of production. Numerous leaders in the sustainable agriculture movement are non-white, and a wide variety of non-white farmer groups use sustainable and

28

traditional practices to produce food and connect with their culture.73 These leaders are already creating a vision of a more sustainable agriculture, and policymakers should ensure also that farm policy reflects their interests.

<< | >>
Source: Lehner Peter. Farming for Our Future: The Science, Law and Policy of Climate-Neutral Agriculture. Environmental Law Institute,2021. — 255 p.. 2021

More on the topic 2. Non-White Farmers:

  1. Farmers' rights
  2. The answer to the question “who farms?” for most people is simple: farmers.
  3. While farmers have a cabinet-level agency devoted to their interests, there are also millions of other people affected by farm policy who generally have little to no say in it and receive few benefits.
  4. A. Farmers and the Farm Economy
  5. The tension between advancements in biotechnology led by mega-agri-businesses and small-scale farmers: raising an economic imbalance
  6. Appropriation of plant varieties and their collective management: a challenging equilibrium between the promotion of agricultural innovation and Farmers' Rights
  7. Adjudication of public crimes by the people may have been efficacious in the context of a small city-state composed of conservative farmers and middle-class citizens.
  8. Just as the federal government uses farm programs to influence what farmers grow, it also uses dietary recommendations, labeling systems, and procurement policies to influence what people consume.
  9. 4. The Legacy of Discriminatory Agricultural Policy
  10. 4. The Opportunity for Carbon Farming
  11. 3. A More Accurate Assessment of Farm Income and Wealth