In the chapters that follow, first the law of contract, then unjustified enrichment, and finally the law of delict will be dealt with.
The discussion of contract commences with the special contracts before it focuses on general doctrines. This progression from the concrete to the more abstract and general would appear to accord best with the way the Roman lawyers developed their law of contractual obligations.
As far as the special contracts are concerned, contracts verbis, litteris, re and consensu are distinguished. This fourfold (!) scheme of contractual obligations is based on the manner in which the contract was concluded; as with the two other important systems discussed in this chapter, it dates back to Gaius.[156]Fundamental, however, to the subject matter of this book is the Roman concept of an obligation and it appears to be apposite, therefore, first to consider three of its most important implications (Chapter 2). We shall then proceed to discuss the stipulation, prototype of a contract verbis and cornerstone of the Roman contractual system. Two particularly important types of transaction (conventional penalties and suretyship) which had to be concluded by way of a stipulation will be examined next {Chapters 4 and 5). The following two chapters are devoted to the four real contracts (mutuum, commodatum, depositum, pignus), the next eight to the four consensual contracts (emptio venditio, locatio conductio, mandatum and societas).[157] Though not a contract, negotiorum gestio will be dealt with, for the sake of convenience, as an appendage to mandatum. Donation will be discussed last (Chapter 16); it was not a contract in classical Roman law, but became one in post-classical times. The chapter on pacta and innominate real contracts will take us into the general part of our study of the law of contract, for it is here that we find the doctrinal bridge towards the modern general law of contract. In the subsequent chapters consideration will therefore be given to the most important problem areas affecting every type of contract: how does it come into existence and what is it based upon; what are the effects of error, of metus and of dolus on the contractual relationship between the parties; what are the principles governing the interpretation of contracts; under which circumstances are contracts invalid and how can the obligations arising therefrom be terminated; which provisions may the parties include in their contract (conditions and time clauses will be dealt with as an example of two particularly important examples); and what are the consequences of a breach of contract. The law of unjustified enrichment forms the subject of Chapter 26; together with negotiorum gestio (Chapter 14), it is the only "quasi-contract" considered in some detail.
With Chapter 27 we embark on our discussion of the law of delict; some general comments will be followed by a consideration of the most important specific delicts: furtum, damnum iniuria datum and iniuria. Finally, we shall turn our attention to certain instances of strict liability.arising from a contract of sale. For a thorough analysis along these lines, cf. Ralf Michael Thilo. Der Codex accepti et expensi im Romischen Recht (1980"). pp. 42 sqq.. 79 sqq. (on the Roman bookkeeping and accounting system), pp. 162 sqq. (on the codex accepti et expensi), pp. 276 sqq. (on the contract litteris); c{. further, for example, Savigny, Vermischte Schriften. vol. I (1850), pp. 205 sqq.; De Zulueta, Gaius II, pp. 163 sqq.; Thielmann, Privatauktion. pp. 110 sqq.; 196 sqq.; Watson, Obligations, pp. 18 sqq.; Pierrejouanique, "Le codex accepti et expensi chez Ciceron", (1968) 46 RH 5 sqq.; M.W.E. Glautier, "A Study in the development of Accounting in Roman Times", (1972) 19 RIDA 310 sqq.; Honsell/Mayer- Maly/Selb, pp. 251 sqq.
More on the topic In the chapters that follow, first the law of contract, then unjustified enrichment, and finally the law of delict will be dealt with.:
- Indebitum solutum and unjustified enrichment
- See Bauman, R. A., 'The Interface of Greek and Roman Law: Contract, Delict and Crime' (1996) 43 RIDA 3, 39-62 for an interesting discussion on delict and crime.
- The subject called �obligations' is mostly about contract and delict. There are some other heads to be considered, but the right impression is given if we say that contract and delict between them occupy about ninety per cent of the ground.
- PART VII Unjustified Enrichment
- ‘Quasi-contract’ is an unsatisfactory term applied to certain specific obligations which did not arise from contract or delict but were legally enforceable.
- Delict and contract
- ENRICHMENT REMEDIES IN MODERN LAW
- 1. The "weakness" of enrichment claims in German law
- The contract—delict dichotomy
- There are different ways or organising a law of contract. That is as much as to say that there are different ways of responding to the central tasks which contract has to perform.
- The origins of delict in Roman law
- 1. Causation in the Roman law of delict
- TOWARDS THE MODERN, GENERALIZED LAW OF DELICT
- In modern law a distinction is drawn between delict (or tort) and crime, or between the delictual (or tortious) and criminalaspects of an act.
- Breach of contract in German law
- Breach of contract in English law