Private criminal law and public criminal law
A delict was a private wrong and yet the actio poenalis served to penalize the wrongdoer. It is obvious, therefore, that the private actio poenalis discharged what we would consider to be the proper function of a criminal prosecution.
On the other hand, however, Roman lawyers also recognized a number of crimes; in fact, the modern distinction between crime and delict goes back to the Roman notions of crimen and delictum. But the boundary between the two was not drawn along the same lines as it is today.1 3The term "crimen" was used to designate offences prosecuted in the public interest and punishable by a public penalty upon accusation and subsequent condemnation in a special court and according to a strict and largely State-controlled procedure, differing considerably from the one that governed civil trials.11’4 The list of such offences was very small at first; it comprised only a number of acts that were regarded as affecting the community at large particularly severely: treason (perduellio) and certain sacral wrongs, later also murder and crimes involving violence. The lesser forms of criminality were covered by what Kunkel/Kelly refer to as "private criminal law":[4678] [4679] punishment was to be inflicted in the course of civil actions. Just as in the early English common law,[4680] the State thus relied on the initiative of the aggrieved party to get the wheels ofjustice rolling. In Rome this policy was maintained even when, in the course of the later Republic, and under the early Principate, the number of crimes was increased drastically, the system of criminal tribunals rigorously reformed, and the efficiency of the administration of criminal justice generally improved; for, by that time, the private penal actions were already firmly entrenched and remained in force throughout the entire classical period. Even in the genuinely criminal proceedings, however, the system of privately instituted prosecution was the rule: apart from the aggrieved party,[4681] [4682] even the quivis ex populo could initiate the trial and thus assume the role of (private) prosecutor. Of course, the average Roman citizen did not usually do so out of a genuine desire to promote the public interest—the criminal statutes tended to promise considerable rewards for victorious prosecutors. 9.
More on the topic Private criminal law and public criminal law:
- The shift from private law to criminal law
- Chapter 4 Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
- Criminal Law and Procedure
- The Criminal Law
- 1. The concept of theft in criminal law
- Criminal Law and Procedure
- Criminal Law and Procedure
- PRIVATE LAW AND PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW: LOCATING WOMEN
- 2. Two conceptions of criminal norms
- The Criminal Justice Process
- Criminal Offences, Responsibility and Punishment
- Principles of criminal liability and punishment
- The criminal jurisdiction of the magistrates
- The Criminal Trial
- Roman private law developed from the law of procedure, otherwise recognized as the law relating to actions.
- The Criminal Jurisdiction of the Senate
- The criminal jurisdiction of the comitia: iudicia populi
- Crime and Criminal Justice in the Archaic Era
- 2. Public-Private Research Programs
- The second branch of the threefold division of all of private law which Gaius employs in his Institutes is that of the law of 'things'.