<<
>>

From Scholarly Positivism to Statutory Positivism

Particularly important for the process of disjunction between private law and legal history was the positivism prevailing since about the 1830s. The nineteenth-century pandectists related it to the system, concepts, and legal doctrine based on the Corpus Iuris.2Ai The system of contem­porary Roman law was supposed to be comprehensive in that it had to be possible to find a logically consistent solu­tion even for problems not specifically dealt with in the sources.

Obviously, these notions were bound to be trans­ferred to the BGB. The scholarly positivism was turned into a statutory positivism.[140] Statutory positivism identifies the law with the entire body of statutory provisions, as long as they have been properly enacted. These provisions consti­tute exclusive reasons to act. Nobody is allowed to argue that there may be better reasons prescribing a different action.[141] [142] For the positivistic judge within a codified system this means that the 'old' law prevailing before the enact­ment of the code has to be ignored even if it appears to offer a more appropriate solution. Hence, for instance, the wide­spread reduction of the historical argument to an explo­ration of the preparatory 'paper trash'.24' That Roman law had been conclusively superseded and abolished appears to have been so self-evident that a specific rule along the lines of art. 1 of the Dutch 'Abrogation Act' appeared unnecessary.248

218 See, e.g., Friedrich Endemann, Einführung in this Shatium des Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuchs (3rd edn., first part, 1897), 45, 51; Eduard Heilfron, Lehrbuch des Bür­gerlichen Rechts (4th edn., first part, 1908), 41.

<< | >>
Source: Zimmermann R.. Roman law, Contemporary law, European law. Oxford University Press,2004. — 113 p.. 2004

More on the topic From Scholarly Positivism to Statutory Positivism:

  1. Alexy Robert. The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism. Oxford University Press,2010. — 159 p., 2010
  2. Interpretation in the Statutory Core
  3. Statutory relief for non-Romans: the lex Calpurnia
  4. Additional statutory relief: repetundae and maiestas
  5. THE STATUTORY DEFINITION OF THE DELICT: HARMFUL RESULT
  6. CHAPTER XXIII. MANUMISSION DURING THE EMPIRE {cont.). STATUTORY CHANGES. LI. IUNIA, AELIA SENTIA, FUFIA CANINIA.
  7. The Law of the Twelve Tables and the Growth of Statutory Law
  8. As put by P.B. Hutt, the history of progress in food and drug regulation over the past century is largely the history of the development of science, not the enactment of statutory provisions.1
  9. Content
  10. My Preferred Approach
  11. Remixing Methods: Methodological Considerations for a Critical Study of IR Myths
  12. The Rematerialization of Contract Law
  13. Translators' Preface
  14. The Observer's Perspective
  15. The discussion about principles in contemporary legal theory: How it all started
  16. Law and Philosophy Library
  17. From the sixteenth century to the introduction of the first European civil codes
  18. The Praetorian Periphery
  19. 1. The possible effects of illegality