Current Safety Assessment and Administrative Approval
The introduction of the risk assessment principle and substantial equivalence principle by Measures on Food from New Sources of 2007 was a turning point in the transition from hygiene assessment to safety assessment.
To apply for approval for novel food material, the applicant needs to submit a safety assessment document that clearly indicates the involved chemical substances like food additives and processing aids, the composition, labeling, and so on.[526] Whether these statements comply with the mandatory national food safety standards will be further reviewed by the scientific experts. Notably, when an approval is granted, a follow-up assessment may be conducted in light of newly emerged scientific information or safety issues related to the approved food material in question in order to avoid health risk. Both for review at the stage of application and the follow-up review, risk assessment has become an essential tool that shall be conducted in line with the Measures on Food Safety Risk Assessment.As far as the substantial equivalence principle is concerned, if a certain new food raw material regarding which an application has been filed and a food or a new food raw material that has been approved are equivalent in terms of species, source, biological property, main ingredients, edible parts, usage quantity, scope of use, potential consumers, and other aspects, and they adopt basically the same techniques and quality requirements, they may be deemed equally
safe and substantively equivalent. With this provision, it is the responsibility of the experts, who are selected from an expert database consisting of professionals from the domain of food, nutrition, and medicine, to carry out the review. If the reviewer finds that the applied novel food material is substantively equivalent to conventional food or announced novel food material during the review, he or she can close the review.
And then, with this scientific opinion, the competent authority can put the food material in the catalogue. As a positive list, food operators can use all foods included in the catalogue directly without additional application. In practice, however, guidelines for food operators for how to carry out a comparison in line with the substantial equivalence principle on their own are still lacking. So, businesses usually depend on administrative assistance to apply this principle.[527]Following the expert opinion, pre-marketing approval issued by the responsible health department constitutes the basic legal mechanism for using novel material in food production. Along with the evolution of legal requirements, there are the following changes regarding the approval procedures. First, before 2007, the approved new sources could be used in production and marketing only within a given location for a trial period of two years. During this period, the composition and production method would not be allowed to change and the involved technique could not be transferred to others, either. Second, the catalogue of approved novel food and food material has been established since 2007 and announced to the public. Accordingly, food operators can directly use the listed food materials as long as they respect the requirements provided in the announcement, such as the usage quantity and labeling. Notably, the health department also has the power to exclude an approved food material from the catalogue in two situations. One case is when the concerned food material is deemed as safe as conventional material on the ground of a period of safe use, and the other case is that the food material at issue is not safe anymore given new scientific opinion issued from a re-review. Third, with the development of administrative law, the rule of law in the approval procedure for novel food material has also been strengthened. As accompanying rule to the Measures on the Safety Review of Novel Food Material, the Rule on Application and Review of Novel Food Material has reinforced the competent authorities’ responsibility in paperwork like in-time notification in receiving the application, demanding additional documents, or refusing an application.
III.
More on the topic Current Safety Assessment and Administrative Approval:
- The administrative organisation of Italy
- FDA Regulatory Regimes in Facilitating the Approval of Animal Drugs
- EFSA’s Role in Scientific Assessment
- The assessment clauses and litiscrescence
- Safety Considerations in the Application of Patents Regarding Novel Food Material
- Current feminist debates
- THE ASSESSMENT OF THE SUM OF CONDEMNATION
- Ni Kuei-Jung, Lin Ching-Fu (eds.). Food Safety and Technology Governance. Routledge,2022. — 252 p., 2022
- Regulating Food Safety Risks
- 3. A More Accurate Assessment of Farm Income and Wealth
- We must understand the limitations of current research and data in order to craft effective policies.