<<
>>

REFERENCES

Ahn, Kyong Whan (1997), �The Influence of American Constitutionalism on South Korea’, S.Ill. U. L. J. 22, 71-115.

Chong, Yong-hwa (1998), �The Conceptual Introduction of Constitutional Democracy to the Late Chosun Dynasty in the 1880s’ (ChosunESeoUi IpHunMinJuJuEui GwanNyumEui SuYong), Journal of the Korean Political Science Association 32, 105-24.

The Constitutional Court (2001), The First Ten Years of the Korean Constitutional Court, Seoul: the Constitutional Court.

The Constitutional Court (2008), Twenty Years of the Constitutional Court of Korea, Seoul: the Constitutional Court.

Healy, G. (2000), �Judicial Activism in the New Constitutional Court of Korea’, Colum. J. Asian L. 14, 214-18.

Hirschl, Ran (2004), Towards Juristocracy - The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.

Kim, Hyo-jeon (1998), �The Constitutional Court in Korea: Its Problems and Proposed Improvement’ (HunBupJaePanJeDEui MunJeJumGwa Gui GaeSunChaek), Public Law (GongBupYunGoo) 27-1, 67-82.

Kim, Jongcheol (2001), �Some Problems with the Korean Constitutional Adjudication System', J. of Korean Law 1, 22-4.

Kim, Jongcheol (2005), �A Proposal for Reform in the Composition of the Constitutional Court', Constitutional Law Review 11-2, 9-48.

Lane, Jan-Erik (1996), Constitutions and Political Theory, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Koopmans, Tim (2003), Courts and Political Institutions - A Comparative View, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Yang, Kun (1998), �The Constitutional Court in the Context of Democratization: The Case of South Korea', Verfassung und Recht in Ubersee 31, 161.

Yang, Kun, Moon-hyun, Kim and Nam, Bok-hyun (1999), Report on Reform of the Korean Constitutional Court Act (HunBupJaePanSoBupEui GaeJungBangAhnEh KwanHan YunGooYongYukBoGoSuh): Studies on Constitutional Adjudication 10, Seoul: The Constitutional Court.

http://english.ccourt.go.kr

89Hun-Ka95, 2 KCCR 245, 260 (3 September 1990) 89Hun-Ma46, 3KCCR263,266 (3 June 1991) 89Hun-Ma178, 2KCCR365, 366 (15 October 1990) 89Hun-Ma181, 3 KCCR 357, 358 (8 July 1991) 89 Hun-Ma120 etc., 2 KCCR 296 (3 September 1990) 91Hun-Ma80, 7-2 KCCR 851, 865 (28 December 1995) 92Hun-Ma68, 4KCCR659, 659 (1 October 1992) 92Hun-Ma144, 7-2 KCCR 94,102 (21 July 1995) 93Hun-Ka3 et al., 6-2 KCCR 1, 11-12 (29 July 1994) 93Hun-Ma81, 5-2KCCR 535 (25 November 1993) 96Hun-Ma172 etc., 9-2 KCCR 842 (24 December 1997) 96Hun-Ra2, 9-2 KCCR 154 (16 July 1997)

98Hun-Ma363, 11-2 KCCR 770 (23 December 1999) 98Hun-Sa98, 11-1 KCCR 264 (25 March 1999) 99Hun-Ra1, 12-1 KCCR 115 (24 February 2000) 99Hun-Ma660, 42 Constitutional Court Official Notice 152 (27 January 2000) 2000Hun-Ma25, 13-1 KCCR 386, 404-405 (22 February 2001) 2002Hun-Ra1, 15-2 KCCR 17 (30 October 2003) 2005Hun-Ra6, 18-1 (Sang) KCCR 82 (2 February 2006)

7.

<< | >>
Source: Cho Kuk. Litigation in Korea. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited,2010. — 257 p.. 2010

More on the topic REFERENCES:

  1. References
  2. Concubinage
  3. Chua Lynette J., Engel David M.. The Asian Law and Society Reader. Cambridge University Press,2023. — 795 p., 2023
  4. Burgess Douglas. When Hope and History Rhyme: Natural Law and Human Rights from Ancient Greece to Modern America. Imagine,2022. — 304 p., 2022
  5. Chapter 1 This Book
  6. 1. Legal theory and mores hodiernae
  7. Introduction
  8. The boni mores and the ins commune
  9. Slavery in Mauritius
  10. The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia