<<
>>

The acquisition of ownership in Roman law took various forms.

These form the body of 0.41.1. At the outset a distinction lias to be drawn between acquiring own­ership inter vivos and through succession, i.e. inheritance on death. Inheritance will be the subject of Chapter 8.

The methods of acquiring ownership inter vivos can be classified in a number of ways. For example, some methods can be described in modern civilian systems as 'original'—where the acquisition of ownership did not depend on there being a prior owner—whereas others were derivative, i.e. where ownership was derived from a prior owner (see Metzger, Companion, 49-65). Or some methods were formal, others causal: in the former case ownership passed because of the use of particular form and ceremony, whereas in the latter case ownership depended on the ground or 'cause' of the acquisition. In Roman law, however, Gaius described the primary classification as follows:

Gaius, Common Mutters or (iohlen Things, book 2: Of some things we acquire ownership under the law of nations which is observed, by natural reason, among all men generally, of others under the civil law which is peculiar to our city. And since the law of nations is the older, being the product of human nature itself, it is necessary to treat of it first. (D.41.1.1 pr.)

Justinian followed this basic distinction between ins civile and ins gentium modes of acquisition. The importance of the distinction lay in the fact that the ins civ­ile modes were confined to those with commercium, i.e. mainly Roman citizens, whereas the ins gentium methods applied to acquisition of property by citizens and non-citizens alike (cf. Inst.2.1.1.; Inst.Gai.2.65.). The ius civile modes were mancipatio, cessio in hire, usucapio, and ad'mdicatio. The ius gentium modes were occupatio, accessio, specificatio, the acquisition of ownership of fruits, treasure­trove, and traditio.

The classification of the modes of acquisition of ownership into original and deriv­ative is based on a modern interpretation of Roman law texts and it is the preferred classification in modern civilian systems. It looks rather different. Thus, the deriva­tive modes of acquisition of ownership are mancipatio, cessio hi hire, and traditio. The original modes of acquisition of ownership are usucapio, occupatio, accessio, specifi­catio, the severance and gathering of fruits, as well as treasure trove. Note that the modern classification (original and derivative) cuts across the Roman categories and leaves certain issues unresolved (see the acquisition of ownership of property through gifts at the end of this chapter). To reinforce the use of this modern classification in civilian systems, let us follow this example by starting with the derivative modes of acquisition.

7.1

<< | >>
Source: Du Plessis Paul J. Borkowski's. Textbook on Roman Law. Oxford University Press,2020. — 440 p.. 2020

More on the topic The acquisition of ownership in Roman law took various forms.:

  1. Acquisition of ownership
  2. Acquisition of the ownership of fruits
  3. In the previous paragraphs, frequent references emphasized the notion of posses­sion as a key to the acquisition of the right of ownership.
  4. This chapter addresses the Roman law of ownership and the rights that modified it, including, for instance, the rights of predial servitude and usufruct.
  5. Roman law recognized two principal forms of security for the performance of an obligation: personal security or suretyship, whereby a person undertook to be personally liable as surety to the creditor for the discharge of the debt[541];
  6. The law of obligations is one of the most significant contributions of Roman law to legal culture, illuminating the civil law tradition more than any other branch of Roman law.
  7. The acquisition of proprietary interests was the chief concern of the law of prop­erty.
  8. As previously noted, the Romans considered the law of succession to be part of the law of things, since succession was construed as a mode of acquisition of rights over things in a mass (per universitatem).
  9. It is difficult to provide a comprehensive and finite list of the sources of Roman law, since the Roman jurists never defined the term 'source of law' and different sources were emphasized at certain periods in the history of the Roman legal system to reflect their prominence as instruments of legal reform.
  10. The direct applicability and direct effect of different forms of EU law
  11. Acquisition, Maintenance and Loss of Possession
  12. 9. OWNERSHIP
  13. Acquisition of legacies
  14. Ownership
  15. Roman private law developed from the law of procedure, otherwise recognized as the law relating to actions.
  16. MODES OF ACQUISITION OF CORPOREAL THINGS
  17. Original modes of acquiring ownership
  18. APPENDIX III. FORM USED BY SLAVE IN ACQUISITION BY MANCIPATIO, ETC.
  19. Ownership