Judicial Protection of the Lower Classes
The society of the late Empire was a non-egalitarian and rigidly stratified society where the mass of the common people (humiliores) were exposed to the arbitrariness of an all-powerful and deeply corrupt administrative apparatus that favoured the upper classes.
Yet members of the lower classes were not entirely bereft of protection against the abuses of an arrogant officialdom. The defensor civitatis or plebis was one of the institutions established by the state for the redress of grievances suffered by the poor and lowly. The office first appeared in the diocese of the Oriens during the early fourth century ad and by the end of that century it had been extended throughout the whole empire.[577] The defensores were probably chosen initially by the citizens from among persons with a high social status (honorati) deemed sufficiently qualified to contest their peers’ excesses, and this selection then awaited confirmation by the praetorian prefect or the emperor. These individuals were entrusted with the special duty of protecting the common people in a municipality against acts of extortion and oppression committed by the bureaucracy and the mighty landowners (potentiores, possessores). This authority enabled them, for example, to prevent torture in criminal proceedings; veto the arrest of a person suspected of a crime; and intercede against unfair fiscal exactions and enforced military service. Moreover, they were endowed with a minor jurisdiction in criminal and civil matters that was subject to an appeal to the provincial governor, and could arrest and transfer to the governor those accused of serious crimes.[578] For a phase, the defensor and his court were apparently successful in providing cheap and swift justice to members of the lower classes. However, in the long term the institution failed to achieve its goal of alleviating the conditions of the poor and the underprivileged. Probably the greatest difficulty was to locate, in this degenerate age, strong and upright men willing to undertake the burdens of the office and capable of resisting the pressures of the powerful. Hence, different methods for appointing holders of the said office were engaged now and then. Ultimately, the defensor civitatis became simply another extraordinary magistrate and an instrument of the bureaucracy and the land-owning elite whose abuses he was originally destined to curb.As the institution of the defensor civitatis proved short-lived, oppressed people increasingly sought protection from the Christian bishops whose influence in the administration of secular justice tended to intensify. From the perspective of the civilian population, the operation of the administration became increasingly oppressive and Christianity assuaged this situation. The faith embodied an egalitarian ideology that viewed all humans as equal before God and it exercised a mitigating influence in several fields on the conditions of the oppressed classes and groups. For example, bishops could frequently defend refugees who pursued sanctuary in churches, or intervene in favour of the accused or the convicted in criminal trials. Moreover, these bishops as religious heads of their towns were more effective than the defensores in protecting impoverished citizens against the unfair demands of imperial officials. One may declare in conclusion that during a period featuring the most lawlessness thus far in Roman history, the influence of the Church constituted an important element of civil stability and protective justice.
More on the topic Judicial Protection of the Lower Classes:
- The social classes
- The social classes
- Interdictal protection of possession
- Protection of Possession
- THE ROLE OF THE PRAETOR AS JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
- The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
- EXTRA-JUDICIAL ACTS
- Error and the protection of the promisee
- Judicial service: honor or duty?
- Protection of Servitudes
- 1. The Relevance of Judicial Precedents
- II THE PROTECTION OF A FREEMAN'S BODILY INTEGRITY
- Protection of human rights by the common law
- 5 The Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
- The execution of judicial decisions under the formulary system
- The protection of a freeman's life and bodily integrity