HELPING A FRIEND?
At first glance the facts relate to two friends, and it is indeed this benevolent interpretation that has prevailed. It does not surprise that during the Middle Ages Vivianus sidestepped explanations on usury,[720] but it is a show of strength of the legal tradition that friendship continues to be mentioned in the interpretations of Koschaker,[721] Kaser[722] and Zimmermann.[723] This raises the question why the case of two ‘friends’, who do not have cash but are engaged in moneylending, keeps making the law reports.68
7.
More on the topic HELPING A FRIEND?:
- Liability for Helping
- Preface
- The cases of advocates
- Introduction
- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- The founders of the civil law
- The tension between ‘informal’ exchange networks and ‘over-regulation’ of access to seeds: raising a social sharing disruption
- 2. Plant-Forward Alternatives
- INTERNATIONAL LEGAL CONTEXT-MAKING: DOING THINGS WITH TIME
- Mandatum
- The monarchs’ triumph
- 6.1 The European message and its narrative
- SANCTION AND THE STATE
- Ill CHARACTER AND TENDENCIES OF ROMAN JURISPRUDENCE IN THE HELLENISTIC PERIOD
- The actio negotiorum gestorum contraria
- Fault as the basis of delictual liability
- Aemilius Papinianus
- 3.2 Savigny’s Chair in Berlin