<<
>>

The New Condition in the West

Western Europe came to be inhabited by a number of new and “barbarian” populations. Anyone who was not “Roman” was a “bar­barian.” The term’s negative connotations came from a comparison of customs, always to the disadvantage of the “barbarians.” When each of these peoples had become established in a territory of its own—at times after long wanderings—it felt the need of a “law” to give order to its social life.

Two motivations joined to define this need and the means for satisfying: first, a desire to retain the “true” form of ancient oral customs that risked becoming contaminated or pol­luted by contact with Roman populations; second, a desire for a writ­ten text that would both preserve the ancient norms and make them known to the “Romans.” For “barbarians” and “Romans” alike, the life of society was ruled by custom in unwritten norms known by ex­perience and transmitted from one generation to another. Each of these norms was thought to remain identical to an original kept in folk memory, but in fact oral methods of conservation and oral trans­mission modified them incessantly, either by deliberate acts or by in­attention and error.

The attempt to crystallize the contents of such customs in written form was thus only indirectly presented as the projection of a ruling power; it was more directly linked to the will of a community work­ing to save its own patrimony of customs.

If we keep in mind that customary law was always highly uncertain in Europe between the sixth and the eleventh or twelfth centuries, that specific testimony was often needed to verify a precept (inquisitio per testes), and that written redactions of “Roman” customs were of­ten lacking, we can better circumscribe the field within which the bar­barian “laws” operated and better evaluate their historical impor­tance.

In reality the barbarian “laws” gathered together only a small part of a much vaster and more variegated store of popular usages. They left many customs unrecorded, and their frequent revisions and successive additions to them were insufficient to complete them. Among the “laws” of this sort that might be mentioned here were the Lex Visigothorum promulgated by King Recesvinde in 654 for the Kingdom of the Visigoths in Spain (also called Forum iudiciorum or Fuero Juzco)∖ the Lex Burgundionum (also called Lex Gundobuda or Gumbata) promulgated by King Gundobad between the last years of the fifth century and 501; the Lex Salica, in force throughout much of what is now France and continually revised from a nucleus that dated from around 511; the LexRipuaria', and, for Germanic lands, the Pac­tus Alamannorum^ which we can date between 584 and 629, the Lex Alamannorum of between 712 and 725, and the Lex BaBvariorum of 743-44-.

Analogous historical processes were taking place in Italy. In 643 the seventeenth Lombard king, Rothari, published ⅛nEdιctum and stated in its preface that he had been led to this act because the ex ertitales, the arms-bearing men (hence the greater part of the young male pop­ulation), felt a strong need for it. They wanted to have the genuine Lombard customs (cawarfidae), whose purity was threatened, set down firmly (adfixae) in a certain and authoritative written text. In reality a transformation was already taking place, accelerated by the use of the Latin language to translate the consuetudinary norms into legislative terms. The very idea of publishing the contents of custom­ary norms in the form of royal edicts, thus changing their juridical tide, contributed notably to changing them. The redaction of laws continued with Grimoald in 668 and, in particular, with the many Edicta OfLiutprand from 713 to 735. Liutprand was the first Lombard king to be converted to Catholicism, with the result that there was a constant tension in his legislative acts between the more intransigent and primitive point of view of some of his people attached to the pa­gan tradition and the point of view of the crown and the parts of the population that supported the monarchy and openly favored the Christianization and Romanization of everyday customs and habitual rites.

This tension was particularly evident in a few specific cases. One example was trial by duel. Single combat was an institution for the settling of difference typical of populations who saw physical force as the most adequate means for resolving conflicts of interest. In some cases, the “judge” in the “trial” (who was not a jurist) was not ex­pected to investigate what had occurred or to try to find the reasons for it, which were discussed, tested, and weighed in accordance with preordained formal schemes. Thus such “judges” were not charged with “judging” in any usual sense but only with being present at a contest and declaring the “right” of the combatant who, by his physi­cal strength, skill, or luck, was the winner in the field. There was nonetheless a tendency, vaguely expressed and more often discernible in the statements of a king than in actual events, for the sovereign to invite the “judges” to take into account the “laws” (that is, the Edicta) or customary norms, to verify that they had been respected, and, in case of violation, to oblige the contesting parties to respect them or, after evaluation of the damages, to oblige the party responsible for the violation to make reparation.

Further Lombard edicts were emitted under Rachis in 745 and 746, under Aistulf from 750 to 755 (the Regnum Iangobardorum), and later with the leges, capitula^ and pacta of princes and dukes in Benevento, Naples, and Spoleto, even after the Franks under Charlemagne had taken possession of the Lombard kingdom.

6.

<< | >>
Source: Bellomo Manlio. The Common Legal Past of Europe: 1000-1800. The Catholic University of America Press,1995. — 273 p.. 1995

More on the topic The New Condition in the West:

  1. Economic conditions
  2. Law and Revolution
  3. Manorial Law
  4. 4.2.1 The Historiography of Black Slavery in England
  5. New Winds of Freedom
  6. Historical context
  7. Rape on African Shores and Slave Ships
  8. Runaway Slave Communities
  9. The Slave Ship
  10. Marrying and the Catholic Church in the Americas