<<
>>

The Expansion of Enlightened Absolutism in Eighteenth Century Europe: The Great Enlightenment Monarchs

Enlightened absolutism prevailed in many European monarchies. Although the prime examples of this new conception of the monarchy’s function arose in Austria and Prussia—and, therefore, in Italy, as the Peninsula was ceded to the Austrian empire by virtue of the Peace of Utrecht in 1713,[489] its principles were also applied in Russia, Spain and Portugal.

10.5.1 The Austrian and the Prussian Models and Its Reception in Russia

Enlightened absolutism was not, however, just an abstract model, but rather one applied by specific monarchs who would become, a posteriori, the paradigms of

Enlightenment-era kings. These would include the aforementioned Germanic monarchs Maria Theresa and Joseph II of Austria, Frederick II of Prussia, and Catherine II of Russia (who was also of German origin).[490] Catherine II managed to establish a stable regime and serve as a worthy successor to Peter the Great (1682­1725). In addition to pursuing an ambitious foreign policy, essentially aimed at expanding Russia’s borders, mainly at the expense of Poland and Turkey, Catherine “the Great” was infused with French culture, regularly corresponding with the leading French philosophes (Whittaker 2003). This explains her religious tolerance, which led her to offer asylum in Russia to the Jesuits after the suppression of the order in 1773, and her tolerant stance towards Muslims (Fisher 1968, 542-539), one surely driven as well, by her desire to counter the influence of the Orthodox clergy, who she ended up bringing to heel by confiscating their property (de Madariaga 2002, 21-22). Domestically, Catherine II’s great push involved the colonization of southeastern Russia, a task she entrusted to Orlov and Potemkine, who went about seeing to the repopulation of a vast territory that remained virtually uninhabited, despite the fertility of its soil, to this end building roads, towns and cities, and encouraging its settlement by German peasants.[491] In addition to all this she was a great reformer, through the Legislative Commission, convened in 1767 (Alexander 1989, 112-120) which, following the guidelines of the statement of legal principles known as Nakaz, (Butler and Tomsinov 2010), authored by Catherine herself,[492] carried out major reforms of government, legal proceedings, courts and territorial organization, especially at the municipal level.[493] When Catherine II died in 1796,

even though most of the population still lived in destitution or slavery, Russia had significantly expanded its territory, the Russian upper classes were more cultured, the government more reliable, and its administration more effective.[494]

Enlightened absolutism triumphed also on the Iberian Peninsula, in the king­doms of Portugal and Spain.

10.5.2 Portugal in the Pombal Era

In Portugal, the reign of Joseph I (1750-1777) is noteworthy, thanks to his powerful minister Sebastiao Jose de Carvalho e Mello (1699-1782), better known by his title of Marquis of Pombal, granted to him by the king. Of humble origins, when he came to head the government, Pombal forcefully applied in Portugal the political philosophy of enlightened despotism which he had absorbed in London and Vienna. With energy, vigor and determination he set about reforming the Portuguese state and its economic and social life, though this would spark violent resistance by Portugal’s most privileged bodies, as their interests were in jeopardy. The growing opposition to his policies led Pombal to exercise a genuine dictatorship (Cheke 1969) and to employ repression as an instrument of government, including the death penalty, in what Maxwell (1994, 75) has defined as the paradox of Enlightenment and Despotism.[495]

As a thorough adherent to Enlightenment political ideas, Pombal aggressively imposed secularism, the most relevant sign of this commitment being his expulsion of the Jesuits, which took place from 1758 to 1759. The Jesuits’ opposition to his radical political and social reforms, and the problem of what to do about the largely autonomous Jesuit missions in Paraguay, rose after Spain’s transfer of part of its territory to Portugal, spurred Joseph I’s all-powerful minister to convince the king to issue a decree eradicating these missions in the American colonies. Shortly thereafter Pombal took advantage of an attempted regicide in which the Society was unfairly implicated to order the expropriation the Jesuits’ property and to expel them from Portugal on January 19, 1759, a measure carried out with unrelenting ferocity through the laws of September 3, 1759 and the expelling of the Papal Nuncio on June 14, 1760 (Maxwell 1995, 101).

10.5.3 The Eighteenth Century Revolution in Spain

Spain was a country ripe for the full application of enlightened absolutism thanks to the abolition of the public legal institutions of the former states of the Crown of Aragon, by Philip V.

The imposition of Castilian absolutism in Valencia, Aragon, Mallorca and Catalufia after the promulgation of the “Nueva Planta Decrees”, made possible a renovation of Spanish royal power which stands in contrast to the prostration of the Catholic Monarchy during final stage of the Spanish Habsburg monarchy. This shift came about because, among other things, for the first time the Spanish king’s subjects had access to all the monarchy’s different political and administrative positions throughout the realm’s different territories, which meant that the monopoly held by local oligarchies had been broken, with new people permitted to occupy key posts, in many cases based on their merit and capacities.[496]

The peak of enlightened despotism in Spain would coincide with the reigns of Philip V’s children, Ferdinand VI (1746-1759), and Charles III (1759-1788),[497] though the latter had an advantage over his brother, as prior to governing in Spain he had extensive experience, having served as king in Naples and Sicily for 25 years (1734-1759) (Petrie 1971). The reformism of the early Spanish Bourbons was so effective that it triggered what has been called “the 18th-century Revolution” (Herr 1980), which radically transformed Spain.[498]

Enlightened Spanish economists came to embrace the liberalization of the domestic economy, defending the elimination of deep-seated obstacles to agrarian growth, including restrictions on the domestic grain trade, the end of highly disruptive transhumance practices protected by the traditional privileges enjoyed by the powerful stockbreeders lobby known as La Mesta, and a moratorium on the further acquisition of property by the Church (Paquette 2008, 65). The abolition of internal customs, the liberalization of trade with the American colonies, and major fiscal and administrative reforms allowed the monarchy to multiply its revenues,[499] which facilitated the creation of a permanent army and navy, indispensable to defend the country’s overseas territories and allow Spain to regain its status as a great international power.

Also noteworthy was the extensive reform of Spain’s governmental structure, with the development of a powerful central government featuring new institutions, such as secretariats, ministries and the Council of Ministers, the Junta Central Suprema[500] and the reinforcement of the Royal Council of Castile as the monarchy’s highest advisory body, the imposition of administrative centralization thanks to the creation of the office of the intendente (intendant), and a territorial reorganization of the state at the provincial and local levels. All of this was made possible by the Bourbons’ appointments of capable government ministers, first foreigners, such as Orry, under the reign of Philip V, and Esquilache under Charles III, with Spanish ministers soon to follow, such as Jose Patino, the Marquis of Ensenada, and the Count of Floridablanca. The crucial state reform initiatives undertaken by the Spanish Bourbons between the reign of Philip V and Charles III, nurtured a feeling of “Spanishness” among the Crown’s subjects, evidenced by the establishment of the Spanish Cortes[501] and the emergence of two of the symbols of the Spanish state still existing today: the flag and the national anthem.[502]

All of this put Spain and its monarchy back on the European map after the crisis of the seventeenth century. In 1721, Montesquieu would describe how Spain had become once again one of the great European monarchies: “The most powerful states of Europe are those belonging to the emperor, and to the kings of France, Spain and England. Italy, and a large part of Germany, are divided into an infinite number of small states ruled by princes who are, in reality, the martyrs to sover­eignty” (Montesquieu 2008, 136).

It is true that in many cases, reform went further than the people could bear and ended up failing, such as virtually all those measures imposed by Joseph II in Austria. In Portugal, part of the reform introduced during the reign of Joseph I failed because of the Portuguese nation’s indifference and even hostility to it.

Under Pombal, Portugal’s intellectual class would split (as in Spain) into two camps: traditionalists and encyclopedists. In Spain, Charles III had to deal with the Esquilache Riots (1766), instigated by the privileged classes, who frowned upon the king’s reform measures. In the end, however, Charles demonstrated a great ability to implement his policies in a very effective manner, though one more pragmatic than systematic (Bottineau 1993, 295).

10.5.4 The French and British Exceptions

Paradoxically, where enlightened absolutism had the least practical impact was in France, despite the fact that most of the leading philosophes were from there. The French monarchy during the reigns of Louis XV (1715-1774) and Louis XVI continued to embrace divine right theory, with the kings adhering to the schemes of government characteristic of classical absolutism, albeit with some exceptions— such as when Louis XVI abolished torture and slavery, granted legal status to Protestants in 1787, and the following year appointed a commission to study the question of the Jews in France (Gagliardo 1968, 47). This fact surely goes a long way to explaining the violent reaction of the French Revolution, which broke out in a kingdom ruled by a monarchy which had insisted upon conserving the old order and had rejected reform.

Nor did enlightened absolutism triumph in England, but for totally different reasons: since the “revolutions” of the seventeenth century, the principle of auto­cratic monarchy had been rejected, and by the eighteenth century, the English polity had already evolved into a model of government in which “royal prerogative” was kept in check by Parliament. The key entity transformed by reform and the adaptation of the government to new times in Britain was not the crown but, as we shall see, Parliament.

TIMELINE

1701 Rise of the Kingdom of Prussia (capital at Berlin). Frederick of Hohenzollern, son of the Great Elector (of Brandenburg) Frederick William (1640-1688) receives from the Emperor of Austria, Leopold I, the title of “King of Prussia” for his support of the Archduke Charles of Austria in the War of the Spanish Succession.

1711 The Archduke Charles of Austria, aspirant to the throne as a rival to Philip V, is elected as Emperor Charles VI (1711-1740). His election precipitates the end of the war and the signing of the Peace of Utrecht.

1713 Frederick William I rises to the throne of Prussia (1713-1740), the “Sergeant King” who forges Prussia into Europe’s premiere military power. He is the father of Frederick the Great.

1715 September 1. Death of Louis XIV (king from 1643, personal reign from 1661).

1723 End of the Regency of Louis XV of France (born in 1710).

1725 Death of Tsar Peter I the Great (1682-1725), founder of St. Petersburg, after converting Russia into a great European power.

1740 Frederick II the Great of Prussia (1740-1796) and Maria Theresa of Austria (1740-1780) ascend to the throne.

1746 Ferdinand VI assumes the Spanish throne (1746-1759).

1750 Joseph I takes the throne in Portugal (1750-1777), leaving the government in the hands of the Marquis of Pombal, Sebastiao Jose de Carvalho e Melo (1699-1782). This would be Portugal’s last era of splendor.

1755 Death of Charles Louis de Secondat, better known as Montesquieu (born in 1689).

1756 Birth in Salzburg (Austria) of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791).

1759 Charles III (1759-1788) rises to the Spanish throne after having been king of Naples and Sicily (bearing the title of Charles VII) between 1734 and 1759.

1762 The Russian throne is occupied by a German princess married to Tsar Peter III, who she overthrows after organizing a conspiracy against him. Catherine II (1762-1796), better known as the Catherine the Great, along with Peter I, would serve as the leading paladins of enlightened absolutism in Russia.

1774 Death of Louis XV of France after areign of 59 years. He is succeeded by Louis XVI.

1778 May 30. Death of Francois Marie Arouet, better known as Voltaire (born in 1694). On July 2 of the same year Jean Jacques Rousseau dies.

1780 Joseph II becomes Emperor of Austria (1780-1790). Unlike his mother, he adopts a policy of aggressive reform which ultimately fails, rejected by the majority of his subjects.

1784 Death of Denis Diderot, one of the leading French encyclopedists.

1786 Death of Frederick II of Prussia.

1788 Death of Charles III of Spain.

1790 Death of Joseph II of Austria.

1796 Death of Catherine II of Russia.

References

Agnew, H. L. (2004). The Czechs and the lands of the Bohemian crown. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.

Alexander, J. T. (1989). Catherine the Great: Life and legend. New York: Oxford University Press.

Anderson, M. S. (1994). The Italian reformers. In H. M. Scott (Ed.), Enlightened absolutism: Reform and reformers in later eighteenth-century Europe (Repr.). London: Macmillan.

Anderson, M. S. (2000). Monarchs and despots: Tensions within the state. In Europe in the eighteenth century (pp. 160-209). Harlow, UK: Pearson education.

Aulard, A. (1911). Napoleon ler et le monopole universitaire: Origine et fonctionnement de l'Universite. Paris: Armand Colin.

Beales, D. E. D. (1987). Joseph II: In the shadow of Maria Theresa, 1741-1780. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Beales, D. E. D. (2005). Enlightenment and reform in eighteenth-century Europe. London: I.B. Tauris.

Beck, H. (1997). The origins of the authoritarian welfare state in Prussia. Conservatives, bureaucracy and the social question, 1815-70. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

Bergeron, L. (1990). France under Napoleon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bergin, J. (2004). Crown, church and episcopate under Louis XIV. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Bernard, P. P. (1979). The limits of enlightenment: Joseph II and the law. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Bottineau, Y. (1993). Les Bourbons d'Espagne. Paris: Fayard.

Brambilla, E. (2009). Lycees et Universite imperiale. Rives mediterraneennes, (32-33), 97-119.

Butler, W. E., & Tomsinov, V. A. (2010). The Nakaz of Catherine the Great: Collected texts. Clark, NJ: Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.

Calabria, A. (1990). Good government in Spanish Naples. New York: P. Lang.

Cassirer, E. (2009). The philosophy of the enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Castelar, E. (1870). ^De quitin es el patrimonio espanol? and El rasgo. In Cuestiones politicas y sociales (pp. 193-203 and 205-213). V.I. Madrid: A. de San Martin.

Cheke, M. (1969). Dictator of Portugal: A life of the Marques of Pombal, 1699-1782. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press.

Clark, C. (2007). Iron kingdom: Rise and downfall of Prussia, 1600-1947. London: Penguin.

Clarke, H. B. (2013). The last years of Isabel’s reign (1863-1868). In Modern Spain: 1815-1898 (pp. 281-307). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Facsimile reprint. Originally published: Cambridge: University Press, 1906.)

Crankshaw, E. (1970). Maria Theresa. New York: Viking Press.

Crosby, M. B. (2008). The making of a German constitution: A slow revolution. New York: Berg. de Madariaga, I. (1987). La Russie au temps de la Grande Catherine. Paris: Fayard.

de Madariaga, I. (1994). Catalina la Grande. La rusa europea. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.

de Madariaga, I. (2002). Catherine the Great: A short history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Descartes, R. (1998). Discourse on method (3rd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company Inc.

Dickson, P. G. M. (1993). Joseph II’s reshaping of the Austrian Church. The Historical Journal, 36 (1), 89-114.

Dickson, P. G. M. (1995). Monarchy and bureaucracy in late 18th-century Austria. English Historical Review, 110(436), 323-371.

Diderot, D. (1969). Foreword to Volume VIII. In J. L. R. d’Alembert & D. Diderot (Eds.), Denis Diderot's the encyclopedia: Selections (pp. 49-51). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. (Origi­nally published as: Avertissement in d’Alembert, Jean Le Rond and Diderot, Denis (1765) Encyclopedie ou Dictionnaire raisonne des sciences, des arts et des metiers, Paris: Briasson et al., V. VIII, pp. I-II.)

Diez Moreno, F. (1989). La consideration juridico-constitucional del patrimonio nacional. Boletin de la ANABAD, 39(1), 127-136.

Fisher, A. W. (1968). Enlightened despotism and Islam under Catherine II. Slavic Review, 27(4), 542-553.

Frederick II, King of Prussia. (1789). An essay on forms of government, and on the duties of sovereigns. In Political, philosophical and satirical miscellanies (Vol. V, pp. 5-33). London: G. G. J. and J. Robinson.

Gagliardo, J. G. (1968). Enlightened despotism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Godsey, W. D., Jr. (1999). Aristocratic redoubt: The Austro-Hungarian foreign office on the eve of the First World War. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

Gorbatov, I. (2006). Catherine the Great and the French philosophers of the enlightenment. Bethesda, MD: Academica Press.

Goyard-Fabre, S. (1984). Les Idees Politiques de Diderot au Temps de l’Encyclopedie. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, (148-149), 91-119.

Gozzi, G. (2007). Rechtsstaat and individual rights in German constitutional history. In P. Costa & Z. Danilo (Eds.), The rule of law: History, theory and criticism (pp. 237-259). Dordrecht: Springer.

Grell, O. P., & Porter, R. (2000). Toleration in enlightenment Europe. In O. P. Grell & R. Porter (Eds.), Toleration in enlightenment Europe (pp. 1-22). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Harrigan, P. J. (2001). Church, state, and education in France from the Falloux to the Ferry laws: A reassessment. Canadian Journal of History/Annales Canadiennes d'Histoire, 36(1), 51-83.

Hellegouarc’h, J. (Ed.). (2011). Introduction in Voltaire. In Memoirespour servir a la vie de M. de Voltaire ecrits par lui-meme (pp. 7-68). Paris: Honore Champion.

Herr, R. (1980). The eighteenth-century revolution in Spain (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hubatsch, W. (1975). Frederick the Great of Prussia: Absolutism and administration. London: Thames and Hudson.

Imbruglia, G. (Ed.). (2007). Naples in the eighteenth century: The birth and death of a nation state. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Ingrao, C. (1986). The problem of enlightened absolutism and the German states. Journal of Modern History, 58, 161-180.

Israel, J. (2006). Enlightenment! Which enlightenment? Journal of the History of Ideas, 67(3), 523-545.

Johnson, H. C. (1975). Frederick the Great and his officials. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Kant, I. (1991). On the common saying: That may be correct in theory, but it is of no use in practice. In M. J. Gregor (Ed.), Political writings (pp. 61-92). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kuzmics, H., & Axtmann, R. (2007). Authority, state and national character. The civilizing process in Austria and England, 1700-1900. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Langille, E. M. (2007). Voltaire’s satire on Frederick the Great: Candide, His Posthumous Memoires, Scarmendado, and Les Questions Sur l’Encyclopedie. Romance Notes, 48(1), 49-58.

Lentin, A. (Ed.). (1985). Enlightened absolutism (1760-1790): A documentary sourcebook. Newcastle: Avero.

Lough, J. (1968). The article Autorite Politique. In Essays on the Encyclopedie of Diderot and D’Alembert (pp. 424-462). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lough, J. (1985). Reflections on enlightenment and Lumieres. British Journal for Eighteenth­Century Studies, 8(1), 1-15.

MacDonogh, G. (2001). Frederick the Great: A life in deed and letters. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Mason, J. H., & Wokler, R. (Eds.). (2005). Diderot political writings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Maxwell, K. (1994). Pombal the paradox of enlightenment and despotism. In H. M. Scott (Ed.), Enlightened absolutism. Reform and reformers in later eighteenth-century Europe (Repr., pp. 75-118). London: Macmillan.

Maxwell, K. (1995). Pombal: Paradox of the enlightenment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Uni­versity Press.

Melton, J. v. H. (2002). Absolutism and the eighteenth-century: Origins of compulsory schooling in Prussia and Austria. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Monod, P. K. (1999). The power of kings: Monarchy and religion in Europe, 1589-1715. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Monsalve Escrina, A. (2004). Historia juridica del Museo del Prado: (1819-1869). Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat, Baron of. (2008). Letter 103, Usbek to Ibben, at Smyrna. In Persian letters. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Myers, A. R. (1975). Parliaments and estates in Europe to 1789. London: Thames and Hudson.

Noel, C. C. (1994). Charles III of Spain. In H. M. Scott (Ed.), Enlightened absolutism: Reform and reformers in later eighteenth-century Europe (Repr., pp. 119-143). London: Macmillan.

Outram, D. (2007). The enlightenment (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Paquette, G. B. (2008). Enlightenment, governance and reform in Spain and its empire: 1759-1808. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Peck, L. L. (1993). Court patronage and corruption in early Stuart England. London: Routledge. Petrie, C. A. (1971). King Charles III of Spain: An enlightened despot. London: Constable.

Philips, D. (2011). The German example: English interest in educational provision in Germany since 1800. London: Continuum International.

Pomeau, R. (1995). Voltaire en son temps. Paris: Fayard.

Riccards, M. P. (2012). Faith and leadership: The papacy and the Roman Catholic Church. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.

Ripstein, A. (2009). Force and freedom: Kant’s legal and political philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Robbers, G. (Ed.). (2007). Encyclopedia of world constitutions. New York: Infobase publishing.

Ruiz Rodnguez, J. I. (1992). Estructura y recaudacion del servicio de Millones: (1590-1691). Hispania: Revista espahola de historia, 52(182), 1073-1088.

Sauter, M. J. (2009). Visions of the enlightenment: The edict on religion of T788 and the politics of the public sphere in eighteenth-century Prussia. Leiden: Brill.

Savoie, P. (2004). Construire un systeme d’instruction publique: de la creation des lycees au monopole renforce (1802-1814). In J.-O. Boudon (Ed.), Napoleon et les lycees: Enseignement et societe en Europe au debut duXIXe siecle (pp. 39-45). Paris: Nouveau Monde Editions.

Schaich, M. (2007). Monarchy and religion: The transformation of royal culture in eighteenth­century Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schmidt, J. C. (2003). Inventing the enlightenment: Anti-Jacobins, British Hegelians, and the Oxford English Dictionary. Journal of the History of Ideas, 64(3), 421-443.

Smith, A. A. (1985). Kant’s political philosophy: Rechtsstaat or council democracy. The Review of Politics, 47(2), 253-280.

Smith, A. (2009). Historical dictionary of Spain (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.

Storrs, C. (2003). Pombal in Kors. In A. Charles (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the enlightenment (Vol. 3, p. 323). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Strachey, L. (2006). Voltaire and Frederick the Great. In Books and characters: French and English (pp. 137-166). Charleston, SC: Bibliobazaar.

Streeter, M. (2007). Catherine the Great. London: Haus Publishing.

Strugnell, A. (1973). A coherent absolutism. In Diderot's politics. A study of the evolution of Diderot's political thought after the encyclopedie (pp. 93-117). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Szabo, F. A. J. (1994). Kaunitz and enlightened absolutism 1753-1780. Cambridge, UK: Cam­bridge University Press.

Szabo, F. A. J. (2011). Changing perspectives on the revolutionary emperor: Joseph II. Biographies since 1790. The Journal of Modern History, 83(1), 111-138.

Tamahana, B. Z. (2004). On the rule of law: History, politics, theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, I. A. A. (2002). Castile: Polity, fiscality and fiscal crisis “and” Castile: Absolutisms, constitutionalism and liberty. In P. T. Hoffman & K. Norberg (Eds.), Fiscal crisis, liberty and representative government: 1450-1789 (pp. 140-180, and 181-225). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Andres Ucendo, J. I. (1999). El servicio de millones durante el siglo XVII. Bilbao: Universidad del Pais Vasco.

Van Caenegem, R. C. (1994). An historical introduction to private law. Cambridge, UK: Cam­bridge University Press.

Van Caenegem, R. C. (2003). An historical introduction to western constitutional law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Venturi, F. (1990). The first crisis = Settecento riformatore. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Vocelka, K. (2000). Enlightenment in the Habsburg monarchy: A history of a belated and short­lived phenomenon. In O. P. Grell & R. Porter (Eds.), Toleration in enlightenment Europe (pp. 196-211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Voltaire, P. (1846). Lettre de Voltaire a Frederic, Cirey, avril 1739. In Oeuvres de Frederic le Grand (Vol. XXI, p. 322). Berlin: Imprimerie Royale Decker.

Wangermann, E. (2007). Reform Catholicism and political radicalism in the Austrian enlighten­ment. In R. Porter & M. Teich (Eds.), The enlightenment in national context (pp. 127-140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Whittaker, C. (2003). Russian monarchy: Eighteenth-century rulers and writers in political dialogue. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.

Williams, E. N. (1970). The eighteenth-century constitution: 1688-1815 (documents and com­mentary). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Williams, D. (2003). Introduction. In Voltaire political writings (pp. XIII-XXXIV). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Wilson, A. M. (1967). The development and scope of Diderot’s political thought. In Studies on Voltaire and the eighteenth century (Vol. 27, pp. 1871-1900). Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.

Wilson, A. M. (1970). Essays on the “Encyclopedie” of Diderot and D’Alembert (a review). Eighteenth-Century Studies, 3(3), 411-412.

Yonan, M. (2011). Empress Maria Theresa and the politics of Habsburg Imperial Art. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Further Reading

Arendt, H. (1992). Lectures on Kant's political philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Beales, D. E. D. (2009). Joseph II against the world: 1780-1790. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Behrens, C. B. A. (1985). Society, government and the enlightenment: The experiences of eighteenth-century France and Prussia. London: Harper & Row.

Bhat, G. (2007). Recovering the historical Rechtsstaat. Review of Central & East European Law, 32(1), 65-97.

Blanning, T. (2008). The pursuit of glory: The five revolutions that made modern Europe, 1648-1815. London: Penguin.

Blanning, T. C. W. (2013). Joseph II. New York: Routledge.

Broadie, A. (2003). The Cambridge companion to the Scottish enlightenment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Ptess.

Byrne, J. M. (1997). Religion and the enlightenment: From Descartes to Kant. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.

Crocker, L. (1984). Diderot as a political philosopher. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, (148’149), 120-139.

d’Alembert, J. L. R., & Diderot, D. (Eds.). (2003). Encyclopedia of Diderot & d’Alembert. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Library. (Originally published as: d’Alembert, J. L. R., & Diderot, D. (Eds.). (1765). Encyclopedie ou Dictionnaire raisonne des sciences, des arts et des metiers. Paris: Briasson et al.)

Dickson, P. G. M. (1985). Finance and government under Maria Theresia: 1740-1780. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ferguson, R. A. (1997). The American enlightenment: 1750-1820. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gay, P. (1996). The enlightenment: An interpretation. The science of freedom (repr., 2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.

Gershoy, L. (1983). From despotism to revolution, 1763-1789 (Repr.). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Hampson, N. (2004). The enlightenment. In E. Cameron (Ed.), Early modern Europe: An Oxford history (pp. 265-297). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Hargreaves-Mawdsley, W. N. (1979). Eighteenth-century Spain, 1700-1788: A political, diplo­matic and institutional history. London: Rowman and Littlefield.

Hayton, D. W., & Bergin, J. (2010). The eighteenth-century composite state: Representative institutions in Ireland and Europe, 1689-1800. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hespanha, A. M. (1992). Poder e Instituigdes na Europa do Antigo Regime. Lisboa: Cosmos.

Israel, J. (2011). A revolution of the mind: Radical enlightenment and the intellectual origins of modern democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jacob, M. (2006). The radical enlightenment: Pantheists, freemasons, and republicans (2nd rev. ed.). Lafayette, LA: Cornerstone Book.

Krieger, L. (1975). An essay on the theory of enlightened despotism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Kruger, P., & Schroeder, P. W. (2003). The transformation of European politics, 1763-1848. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Lefebvre, G. (1969). Enlightened despotism. In H. Lubasz (Ed.), The development of the modern state (pp. 48-64). London: Macmillan.

Lynch, J. (1989). Bourbon Spain: 1700-1808. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

McKay, R. (2007). The limits of royal authority: Resistance and obedience in seventeenth-century Castile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Melton, J. V. H. (2001). The rise of the public in enlightenment Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Merrick, J. (1990). The desacralization of the French monarchy in the eighteenth century. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.

Mittenzwei, I. (1970). fiber das Problem des aufgeklarten Absolutismus. Zeitschrift fur Geschichtswissenschaft, (18), paragraphs 1162-1172.

Padover, S. K. (1967). The revolutionary emperor, Joseph the Second, 1741-1790. Hamden, CT: Archon Books.

Paquette, G. B. (2013). Imperial Portugal in the age of Atlantic revolutions: The Luso-Brazilian World, c. 1770-1850. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Porter, R. (2000). The creation of the modern world: The untold story of the British enlightenment. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

Proust, J. (1995). Diderot et l'Encyclopedie. Paris: Albin Michel.

Rasmussen, D. C. (2013). The pragmatic enlightenment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Reill, P. H. (2008). Rethinking the enlightenment: Nature and culture in the high and late enlightenment. Amsterdam: Holland University Press.

Robertson, R., & Timms, E. (1995). Austrian enlightenment and its aftermath (New ed.). Edin­burgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Roche, D. (1998). France in the enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Schmidt, J. (2004). What is enlightenment?: Eighteenth-century answers and twentieth-century questions. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Sorkin, D. (2011). The religious enlightenment: Protestants, Jews, and Catholics from London to Vienna. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Szabo, F. A., Szantay, A., & Toth, I. G. (Eds.). (2005). Politics and culture in the age of Joseph II. Budapest: Institute of History, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

Szabo, F. A. J. (2008). The Seven Years War in Europe: 1756-1763. London: Longman.

Tarello, G. (2000). Storia della cultura giuridica moderna. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Trenard, L. (1979). L’absolutisme eclaire: le cas francais. Annales Historiques de la Revolution Francaise, (51), 627-646.

Valsecchi, F. (1990). Il riformismo borbonico in Italia. Roma: Bonacci.

Venturi, F. (1972). Italy and the enlightenment: Studies in a cosmopolitan century. New York: New York University Press.

Venturi, F. (1976). Church and reform in enlightenment Italy: The sixties of the eighteenth century. The Journal of Modern History, 48(2), 215-232.

Voltaire, P. (2000). Treatise on tolerance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Williams, E. N. (1999). The Ancien regime in Europe: Government and society in the major states 1648-1789. London: Pimlico.

<< | >>
Source: Aguilera-Barchet Bruno. A History of Western Public Law. Between Nation and State. Springer,2015. — 788 p.. 2015

More on the topic The Expansion of Enlightened Absolutism in Eighteenth Century Europe: The Great Enlightenment Monarchs: