<<
>>

The Constitutional History of France After Napoleon: From Monarchy to Republic

After the “100 Days” following his defeat at Waterloo, Napoleon finally fell from power (June 18, 1815), for good. In the wake of his downfall, France would repeatedly swing back and forth between monarchism and republicanism.

15.4.1 From Absolutist Restoration to the July Monarchy

Initially Louis XVIII brought back absolute, divine right monarchy (1814-1824), although with the important addition of the “Charter” (La Charte), a constitution “granted” in 1814[809] which, paradoxically, allowed for the establishment of a parliamentary regime in France (Alexander 2000, 29-48), theoretically under the absolute monarchy.[810] This disappeared when Charles X was toppled by the Revo­lution of July 1830 (Pinkney 1973), a popular movement (Newman 1974, 26-59) which ushered in a constitutional monarchy with Louis Philippe I on the throne and Guizot as its most representative minister. The 1830 Revolution, however, did not mark a radical constitutional break with the previous regime,[811] as the new consti­tution retained most of the features of the 1814 Charter (Alexander 2003, 295). Moreover, the new regime was a conservative one, dominated by doctrinaire liberals such as Benjamin Constant (1767-1830), who became the most influential political force in France (Pilbeam 1982, 351-366). This is why, for instance, the government sought to check the power of the legislature’s lower house[812] by maintaining the Chamber of Peers (La Chambre des Pairs), a French version of the British House of Lords.[813]

15.4.2 From the Second Republic to the Second Empire

The “July Monarchy”, meanwhile, disappeared as a result of the revolution of February 1848 (Rude 2005, 164-179), a movement that spread from Paris all over Europe and led to the establishment of the Second French Republic.

This revolution was the first in French history to be driven by what today we might call “socialist” aspirations for greater social justice and equality, as the new regime at first aspired to usher in a “social republic” headed up by revolutionaries like Armand Barbes (1809-1870), who that believed that political reform was the only means to social reform (Meszaros 2000, 43). This explains why for the first time social rights were recognized as fundamental liberties in the new constitution, despite the fierce opposition offered by Alexis de Tocqueville in his famous speech on the Right to Work on September 12, 1848 (Tocqueville and de Beaumont 1968, 179-187).[814]

Concerning the form of government, the 1848 French constitution marked a return to a unicameral assembly-based system, and the consolidation of male universal suffrage. The Second Republic sought to avoid the flaws of the First Republic, particularly its lack of a strong executive power, which had paved the way for Napoleon’s regime. Thus, following the example of the American Republic,[815] the members of the National Constituent Assembly decided that the new republic was to have an elected president. The constitution was approved on November 4, 1848, and on the following December 10, Prince Louis Napoleon, a nephew of Napoleon I, became the first president of a French republic elected by universal suffrage,[816] as the candidate supported by the conservative bourgeoisie.[817]

The new French republic proved fleeting. After being elected president, Louis Napoleon did not hesitate to launch a coup and establish a Second Empire,[818] a “restoration” of the Bonaparte monarchy that would last nearly two decades. The new regime constitutionally marked a return to the Napoleonic, monarchic model of the state, with a very strong Executive and a weakened Legislative power. In the January 1852 constitution Napoleon III created a Legislative Corps, elected by universal male suffrage, and a Senate, entirely controlled by the emperor, who had free rein to appoint all of its members, a second chamber that acted as a forceful brake.[819] The legislature was further restricted by a decree that limited its power to accept or reject proposals produced by the Council of State, whose members were also appointed by the president (van Caenegem 2003, 208-209).

The Second Empire regime, nevertheless, saw an evolution from despotism towards greater democracy. From 1852 to 1860 France operated under a dictator­ship in what historians call the Authoritarian Empire (Price 2001, 25). Beginning in 1860, Napoleon III began to liberalize his regime (Corley 1974), to the point that in May 1870 the opposition forced him to organize a plebiscite, which was, ironically, overwhelmingly won by the government, with the emperor garnering 7,538,000 votes of support versus 1,572,000 negative votes and 1,900,000 abstentions (Zeldin 1963 153-167). It is interesting to note that the emperor considered the plebiscite as an alternative to liberal parliamentary institutions, as he believed it to be the best instrument for the verification of the popular will. Consequently, he did his best to extend the use of this type of consultations (Woodward 1963, 50).[820]

15.4.3 From the Commune to the Third Republic

The Second French Empire would come crashing down, however, upon France’s defeat in the war waged against Bismarck’s Prussia.[821] Three days after Napoleon’s III surrender at Sedan, Leon Gambetta proclaimed the Third Republic in Paris on September 4, 1870. Followed a provisional government named Government of National Defense and presided over by General Trochu (Wawro 2003, 231-234). This ruled during the Siege of Paris (September 1870-January 1871). After France’s surrender national elections were held. The New National Assembly, as a “depository of the sovereign authority”, in its session of February 19, 1871, elected the conservative Adolphe Thiers as provisional “head of the executive power of the Republic”, until the new French institutions were created, under the supervision of the National Assembly.[822] One month later provisional government authority was contested by Paris’s City Council, (Commune), which proceeded to launch the first socialist revolution in Western history.

The Paris Commune (also called the Fourth French Revolution), aspired to extend its authority throughout France, but lasted just 3 months before being brutally crushed by the French National Guard, sent from Versailles where the provisional government was established.[823]

For 5 years uncertainty would reign, as the National Assembly was split between republicans and monarchists. In the end republicanism would prevail, by a single vote (the Wallon Amendment, on January 30, 1875).[824] Thus arose the Third French Republic (1875-1940), notable for its lack of a formal Constitution, as it was based on three “constitutional laws”.[825] This would be the most long-lasting French regime, even down to the present day, as despite the turmoil of the Dreyfus Affair,[826] it would endure for 65 years.

The new Republic, consolidated by Jules Ferry (Fortescue 2013, 36-48), was unquestionably a secular, democratic, assembly-based regime, with a strong legis­lature and a weak executive branch. The constitutional laws of 1875 also consid­erably limited the power of the president of the Republic, who was elected indirectly by the two chambers—the Chamber of Deputies of Representatives (Chambre des deputes) and the Senate, which together formed the National Assem­bly. Each of the presidential acts was to be endorsed by a minister, and the government was to enjoy the confidence of both chambers. The only thing the president of the Republic could do was dissolve the Chamber of Deputies, though for this he required the Senate’s approval. This is what de Malafosse (1975, 156) called the “erasure” of the Executive.

Another peculiarity of the new republican regime was that, as an assembly-based regime, it featured a Senate to counterbalance the political power of the Chamber of Deputies, which was elected by universal suffrage. The Senate, theoretically, was to be a conservative chamber, not only because one had to be 40 years of age to be a senator, but because its members were essentially elected by the representatives of rural France, in the main traditionalists.

Even more important was what W.H.C. Smith (2005, 377) calls “absolute bicameralism”: for the first time the Senate under the Third Republic had the same powers as the directly-elected lower chamber.[827]

Despite the fact that Third French Republic was an assembly-based regime, the state survived thanks to the solid administrative structure established by Napoleon. It is interesting to note that, despite featuring a government with a weak executive, the French Republic won the war of 1914-1918 against the authoritarian Prussian monarchy, thanks in large measure to the impetus and leadership of Georges Clemenceau.[828]

15.4.4 From Petain's “French State” to De Gaulle's

Presidential Republic

The Third Republic fell when Nazi troops invaded France in May of 1940. After the partitioning of France under the Armistice signed on June 22, the two chambers, the Senate and Chamber of Deputies, convened as the National Assembly and decided to liquidate the Third Republic. Of the 666 members of Parliament present on July 10,1940, only 80 voted against granting full powers to Marshal Petain to reform the constitution (Shirer 1994, 942-944). Thus arose a new French state (I’Etat frangais), authoritarian and autocratic (de Malafosse 1975, 313),[829] governed from Vichy, marking the start to one of the most maligned and regretted chapters in French history.[830] Petain’s regime was not, however, the only government of France, as on June 18, 1940, General Charles De Gaulle, exiled in London, issued his “call to honour” (Vinen 2007, 30) in which he exhorted the French not to accept their defeat and form a government for a free France.

Petain’s regime collapsed when Hitler was defeated in 1944, and De Gaulle, who had been promoting a Provisional Consultative Assembly (Assemblee consultative provisoire) since September of 1943, began to issue decrees to establish a new French government and regime.[831]

However, the head of liberated France would end up stepping down, as he did not agree with the re-establishment of an assembly-based government similar to that of the Third Republic, the formula proposed by the majority of the politicians elaborating the new constitutional framework.[832] The new republic’s charter was a full-fledged constitution, as opposed to the three constitutional laws upon which the Third Republic had rested.

It even included in its preamble a concrete reference to the fundamental rights recognized in the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man, enriched by new social and economic rights “particularly necessary to our times”. Democracy was fully established in France, as the 1946 constitution was the first one to recognize the right of French women to vote (article 4).[833]

The 1946 document marked another return to the parliamentary model, with a strong lower house and a weak executive. Under the new regime, the Senate disappeared and the upper house, called The Republic’s Council (Conseil de la Republique), was so irrelevant that in practice it was a unicameral regime.[834]

The Fourth Republic (1946-1958), would prove to be an era of ephemeral gov­ernments, such as that of Pierre Mendes France, one of the most emblematic politi­cians of period and one of the regime’s few real statesmen (Hanley et al. 2005, 27). Mendes became President of the Council of Ministers on June 18, 1954, going on to serve for only seven and a half months (Werth 1957,168-177).[835] This was the order of the day for the different governments under France’s short-lived Fourth Republic.

The crisis in Algeria, a territory integrated into the French State since its conquest in the mid-nineteenth century, which groups of Muslims were struggling to make an independent country, precipitated De Gaulle’s return to power in 1958. The new leader began by initiating a process for the drafting of a new constitution, which would result in the adoption of the one still in effect in France today: that of the Fifth Republic.[836] The Gaullist regime was, of course, republican, but unlike the previous one it was markedly presidential, as the Constitution of 1958 conferred major powers upon the president (Lascombe 2010, 30-31), at the expense of the legislature. Under the new system the Senate recovered a significant institutional role,[837] while the executive became the primary legislative power.[838]

Presidential power was consolidated after De Gaulle miraculously survived an assassination attempt in the Paris suburb of Petit Clamart on August 22, 1962.[839] As a result of this, fearing that if he disappeared the French Republic could become a Parliamentary regime again, he asked the French people to modify the 1958 Constitution by introducing the direct election of the President via universal suffrage. In the referendum held on October 28, 1962, he won a resounding personal victory against the political parties, as the French people accepted the principle that the President of the Republic ought to receive direct legitimacy from a direct election (Bernstein 1993, 71-82). Since then, the French have elected their President by universal and direct vote and not, as was traditionally done, indirectly via designation by both chambers of the legislature.

15.4.5 French Semi-presidentialism: A Return

of the Napoleonic Model of State?

After the reform of 1962, France’s constitutional regime (still in place today) found itself somewhere between Bonapartist republicanism and American presidentialism (Cambadelis 1987). Under it when presidents enjoy majority support in the National Assembly the regime becomes “presidential”, as it is the president who holds and exercises power, while when the legislature is controlled by an opposition party, the “parliamentary” system prevails, as executive power is actually wielded by the prime minister. This system, dubbed “cohabitation”, (Bell 2000, 31) has prompted some constitutionalists to brand the French regime “semi-presidential” (Marrani 2013, 11-14).

That said, it is necessary to emphasize that the president of the French Republic, provided that he enjoys a political majority in the National Assembly, holds greater constitutional powers than the President of the United States. His term lasts 5 years (formerly seven), and he may be re-elected several times, with the caveat that he may not serve more than two consecutive terms, this last limitation approved in 2008 after being advanced by Nicolas Sarkozy,[840] even though no previous president ever did serve more than two terms in a row under the current constitution.

Mitterrand (1981 and 1988) and Chirac (1995 and 2002) are the only ones to have been elected twice and served out their second terms.[841]

The power of the president of the Republic has been mitigated, however, by the introduction by President Sarkozy of the question prioritaire de constitutionalite (priority preliminary ruling on the issue of constitutionality), a constitutional reform measure passed on July 23, 2008, which strengthens the role of the Consti­tutional Council and introduces the principle of “judicial review”[842] for the first time in French history.

TIMELINE

The Napoleonic Stage (1799-1815)

1769 August 15. Birth of Napoleon Bonaparte in Ajaccio (Corsica).

1785 Napoleon graduates as a 2nd Lieutenant of Artillery.

1792 Bonaparte is promoted to captain.

1793 December 22. Napoleon is promoted to brigadier general because of his decisive action in the taking of Toulon from the British.

1794 July. Napoleon is arrested for his Jacobin ideas and his ties to Robespierre.

1795 October 5. Napoleon saves the Government of the Convention by quelling a monarchist uprising. As a result, he is promoted to division general (general Vendemiaire) and is assigned command of the Army of the Interior.

1796 March 8. Napoleon marries Josephine de Beauharnais. March 27. Napoleon takes control of the Army of Italy.

1797 November 16. End of the Italian Campaign. His victories make Napoleon France’s most popular military figure.

1798 July 21. Battle of the Pyramids (Egyptian Campaign).

August 2. The French war fleet is annihilated at Aboukir Bay by Admiral Nelson.

1799 October 9. After a 47-day voyage in which he manages to evade English warships, Napoleon reaches France.

November 9. Napoleon seizes power through a coup d’etat. December 25. The Year VII Constitution (1799) enters into force.

1802 August 2. French electors approve of Napoleon becoming Sole Consul, for life. Two days later the Constitution of the Year X is approved (August 4, 1802).

1804 May 18. (28 Floreal, An XII). The Senate approves a new constitution under which the government of the Republic is handed over to Napoleon as “Emperor of the French”. The Constitution is ratified by plebiscite on November 6, 1804.

1805 October 21. Defeat at Trafalgar.

December 2. Battle of Austerlitz. This victory marks the zenith of Napoleon’s military glory.

1812 June. Napoleon invades Russia in command of 700,000 men. December. Napoleon withdraws from Russia in defeat.

1814 March 31. Marshals force Napoleon to abdicate.

April 3. The Senate removes Napoleon from office.

June 4. Louis XVIII grants the French a charte.

1815 March 1. Napoleon disembarks in France.

March 20. The flight of Louis XVIII. Napoleon at the Tuileries Palace. April 22. Additional Act to the constitutions of the Empire.

June 18. Napoleon is defeated at Waterloo.

June 22. Napoleon’s second abdication. October 14. Napoleon reaches St. Helena on the English warship Northumberland.

The Restoration (1815-1830)

1815 August 14 and 22. Legislative elections. The legislature strongly supports Louis XVIII (Chambre introuvable).

1821 May 5. Napoleon dies on St. Helena.

1824 September 16. Death of Louis XVIII. He is succeeded by his brother Charles X (1824-1830).

The July Monarchy (1830-1848)

1830 July 27, 28, and 29. “July Revolution”. Fall of Charles X.

August 9. Louis Philippe, Duke of Orleans, rises to the throne. Absolute monarchy gives way to constitutional monarchy (“July Monarchy”). The Chamber of Deputies thoroughly revises the Charte of 1815.

The Second Republic (1848-1852)

1848 February 22. The people of Paris rise up against Louis Philippe, Duke of Orleans. Barricades.

February 25. Restoration of universal male suffrage.

November 4. Adoption of the Constitution of the Second Republic.

The Second Empire (1852-1870)

1852 December 2. Louis Napoleon Bonaparte proclaims the Second Empire.

1870 September 1. Napoleon III is taken prisoner by the Prussians at Sedan. The Second Empire comes to an end.

September 4. Proclamation of the Third Republic in Paris.

The Third Republic (1870-1940)

1871 March 18-May 28. Paris Commune insurrection. The first “proletarian” revolution in Western history.

1875 January 30. The Wallon Amendment.

February 24. The National Assembly passes a law on the Organization of the Senate. This is the first “constitutional law”.

February 25. Adoption of the “second constitutional law” on the organization of public powers.

July 16. Third and last constitutional law on the relationships between the public powers. The three constitutional laws underpin the “Constitution of the Third French Republic”.

1905 Church and State Separation Law (Loi de separation des Eglises et de I'Etat).

World War II

1940 June 17. Petain accepts French surrender to Germany.

June 18. De Gaulle from London calls French people to resist the German occupation.

July 10. The French National Assembly and the Senate grant full powers to General Petain to promulgate a new Constitution of the French State. End of the Third Republic.

1943 September 17. De Gaulle creates a Provisional Consultative Assembly in exile.

1944 April 21. De Gaulle issues an ordonnance amounting to a provisional constitution organizing public powers in liberated France.

June 3. Creation of the Provisional Government of the Republic, headed by De Gaulle. June 6. D-Day. Normandy Landing (Operation Overlord).

June 14. De Gaulle delivers a speech in Bayeux, the first city liberated by the Allies.

August 9. Through an ordonnance republican legality in France is reestablished and the Vichy regime is declared null and void. August 25. Surrender of the German garrison occupying Paris.

1945 October 21. Elections to choose a Constitutional Assembly. The same elections approve, via referendum, a provisional “constitutional law”.

The Fourth Republic

1946 January 20. De Gaulle resigns as head of the Provisional Government out of disagreement with the terms of the new constitution.

May 5. The April 19, 1946 draft of the constitution is rejected by the French in a referendum.

June 2. A new Constituent Assembly is elected.

June 16, 1946. De Gaulle delivers a speech at Bayeux articulating his constitutional ideas for a republic with a strong executive.

October 13. The constitution of the Fifth French Republic is approved in a referendum.

October 27. The Constitution enters into force.

The Fifth Republic

1958 May 29. The President of the Republic, Rene Coty, asks Charles de

Gaulle to form a government. The National Assembly confirms De Gaulle as the head of the government on June 1.

June 3. The National Assembly approves a new constitutional law. September 28. The new Constitution is approved in a referendum by 79.25 % of the votes.

October 4. The Constitution is promulgated.

November. De Gaulle wins the legislative elections in a landslide. December. De Gaulle is elected President of the Republic with 78 % of the votes cast by 80,000 “great electors” (indirect suffrage).

1962 August 22. Assassination attempt on De Gaulle in Petit Clamart. September. General De Gaulle proposes amending the Constitution to allow the President of the Republic to be elected by a direct vote. October. In a referendum 62.25 % approve the modification of the Constitution.

1965 December 19. General de Gaulle is elected in a second round of

voting with 55.20 % of the votes. President of the Republic. The first French presidential election by direct vote.

1969 April 27. De Gaulle loses a referendum on territorial reform (52.41 % of votes against). He resigns the next day.

June 15. Georges Pompidou, President.

1970 November 9. Death of Charles de Gaulle.

1974 April 2. Death of Georges Pompidou.

May 19. Valery Giscard d’Estaing, President.

1981 May 10. Francois Mitterrand is elected President of the Republic.

(51.76 %). The Fifth Republic’s first leftist president.

1986-1988 First “cohabitation”. Jacques Chirac, Prime Minister.

1988 May 8. Mitterrand is re-elected President of the Republic (54.02 %).

1993-1995 Second cohabitation. Edouard Balladur, Prime Minister.

1995 May 7. Jacques Chirac is elected President of the Republic. Re-elected in 2002.
1996

1997-2002

January 8. Francois Mitterrand dies of cancer.

Third cohabitation. Socialist Lionel Jospin, Prime Minister. Conservative President Jacques Chirac.

2002 Jacques Chirac is reelected, but for the first time the presidential term is of 5 years (quinquennat, approved in the 2000 referendum).
2007 May 6. Nicolas Sarkozy is elected the sixth president of the Fifth Republic (53.06 %).
2008 July 23. A reform measure introduces the principle of “judicial review” into the French constitutional system.
2012 May 6. Socialist leader Francois Hollande becomes the seventh president of the Fifth Republic (51.64 %).

References

Aguilera-Barchet, B. (2008). Las raices jundicas del Estado espanol contemporaneo: La Guerra de la Independencia y el afianzamiento del sentimiento nacional. Notas paraun ensayo de historia constitucional europea comparada. In Estudios sobre la Constitution de Bayona (pp. 85-207). Madrid: La Ley.

Alexander, R. (2000). ‘No, Minister’: French restoration rejection of authoritarianism. In D. Laven & L. Riall (Eds.), Problems of government in restoration Europe: Napoleon's legacy (pp. 29­47). Oxford: Berg.

Alexander, R. (2003). Re-writing the French revolutionary tradition: Liberal opposition and the fall of the Bourbon monarchy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Arnaud, A. J. (1969). Les origines doctrinales du Code civil frangais. Paris: Librairie Generale de Droit et de Jurisprudence.

Baguley, D. (2000). Napoleon III and his regime: An extravaganza. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.

Bakunin, M. A. (1871). The Paris commune and the idea of the state. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Barnard, H. C. (2009). Education and the French Revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bell, D. S. (2000). Presidential power in fifth Republic France. Oxford: Berg.

Bergeron, L. (1990). France under Napoleon (8th printing). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bernstein, S. (1993). The Republic of De Gaulle: 1958-1969. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bessiere, A. (2008). Il etait unefois la Legion d'honneur: De la croix des braves au ruban rouge. Paris: L’Harmattan.

Billias, G. A. (2009). European revolutions of1848: France in American Constitutionalism heard round the world, 1776-1989: A global perspective (pp. 179-183). New York: New York University Press.

Bluche F. (1980). La dictature legitimee. Le Bonapartisme: aux origines de la droite autoritaire (1800-1850) (pp. 24-35). Paris: Nouvelles Editions Latines.

Boudon, J.-O. (Ed.). (2004). Napoleon et les lycees: Enseignement et societe en Europe au debut duXXe siecle. Paris: Nouveau Monde Ed.

Boycott-Brown, M. (2001). The road to Rivoli: Napoleon's first campaign. Herndon, VA: Cassell

& Co.

Brint, S. G. (2006). Schools and societies (2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Cambadelis, J. C. (1987). Bonapartisme et neocorporatisme sous la Ve Republique. Lille, FR:

Atelier National de Reproduction des Theses.

Camby, J. P., Fraisseix P., & Gicquel J. (2011). La revision de 2008: une nouvelle constitution? Paris: Lextenso Editions.

Cavallaro, D. (2003). French feminist theory. London: Continuum.

Chevallier, J.-J., Carcassonne, G., & Duhamel, O. (2014). Histoire de la cinquieme republique: 1958-2012. Paris: Dalloz.

Churchill, Wiston, Sir (2012) Clemenceau in great contemporaries (pp. 229-244). Wilmington, DE: Intercollegiate Studies Institute.

Connelly, O. (2000). The French Revolution and Napoleonic Era (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.

Conner, S. P. (2004). The age of Napoleon. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Corley, T. A. B. (1974). Democratic despot: A life of Napoleon III (Reprint.). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Coutant, A. (2009). 1848: Quand la Republique combattait la democratie. Paris: Mare et Martin. Curtis, E. N. (2013). The French assembly of 1848 and American Constitutional Doctrines.

Independence, KY: Gale. (Repr. of the 1917 ed. New York: Columbia University Press). Chatel de Brancion, L. (2009). Cambaceres: Maitre d’auvre de Napoleon (2e (id.). Paris: Perrin. De Gaulle, P. (2003). De Gaulle, mon pere: entretiens avec Michel Tauriac (2 Vols.). Paris: Plon. de Malafosse, J. (1975). Histoire des institutions et des regimespolitiques de la Revolution a la IVe

Republique. Paris: Montchrestien.

Drake, D. (2005). The Dreyfus affair and the emergence of the French public intellectual. In French intellectuals and politics from the Dreyfus affair to the occupation (pp. 8-34). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Durant, W., Durant, A. (2001). A revolution in education. In R. Obstfeld & L. Obstfeld (Eds.), Napoleon Bonaparte (pp. 65-69). San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press.

Dwyer, P. (2008). Napoleon: The path to power, 1769-1799. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Emsley, C. (2003). Napoleon. New York: Routledge.

Englund, S. (2004). Napoleon: A political life. New York: Scribner.

Everdell, W. R. (2000). Leon Gambetta and the Troisieme: The parliamentary republic. In The end of kings: A history of republics and republicans (pp. 219-245). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Fiorentino, K. (2008). La seconde Chambre en France dans l'histoire des institutions et des idees politiques: (1789-1940). Paris: Dalloz.

Flood, C. G. (2002). Case studies in Mythopoeic narrative (1): De Gaulle’s “Bayeux Constitution”. In Political myth: A theoretical introduction (pp. 195-234). Oxon, UK: Routledge.

Fortescue, W. (2005). France and 1848: The end of monarchy. New York: Taylor and Francis. Fortescue, W. (2013). The third republic in France: 1870-1940. Conflicts and continuities..

London: Routledge.

France. Assemblee Nationale (1871). From 12 february to 11 March. In Annales de l'Assemblee Nationale. Paris: Imprimerie et librairie du Journal Officiel.

Fritz, G. (2000). La question de l'influence americaine dans La Constitution de 1848. Dijon, FR: Editions Universitaires de Bourgogne.

Gaffney, J. (2012). Political leadership in France: From Charles de Gaulle to Nicolas Sarkozy. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Geyl, P. (1982). Napoleon. For and against. Harmondsworth: Penguin (Reprint of 1948 edition: New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

Gooch, B. D. (1966). Napoleon III,-Man of destiny: Enlightened statesman or proto-fascist?

New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Gordley, J. (2013). The Jurists: A critical history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gordon, B. M. (1995). The ‘Vichy Syndrome’ problem in history. lin French Historical Studies, 19(2), 495-518.

Goubert, P. (2003). The course of French history. New York: Taylor and Francis.

Grab, A. (2001). State, society and tax policy in Napoleonic Europe. In P. G. Dwyer (Ed.), Napoleon and Europe (pp. 169-186). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.

Hanley, D. L., Kerr, P., & Waites, N. H. (2005). Contemporary France: Politics and society since 1945. New York: Taylor and Francis.

Hicks, P. (2012). Napoleon as a politician. In M. Broers et al. (Eds.), The Napoleonic empire and the New European political culture: War, culture and society, 1750-1850 (pp. 70-81). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hudson, N. E. (1973). Ultra-royalism and the French Restoration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, New York: Octagon Books. (Reprint of the 1936 ed.).

Huet, V. (2007). Napoleon I: A new Augustus? In C. Edwards (Ed.), Roman presences: Receptions of Rome in European culture, 1789-1945 (pp. 53-69). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Jainchill, A. J. S. (2008). Reimagining politics after the terror: The Republican origins of French liberalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Jefferson, T. (1907a). Letter to William Bentley. Monticello, December 28, 1815. In The writings of Thomas Jefferson (Vol. XIV, pp. 363-365). Washington, DC: Bergh.

Jefferson, T. (1907b). Letter to Benjamin Austin, Esq. Monticello, January 9,1816. In The writings of Thomas Jefferson (Vol. XIV. pp. 387-393). Washington, DC: Bergh.

Jordan, D. P. (2012). Napoleon and the revolution. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Klinge, M. (2004). Teachers. In W. Riiegg (Ed.), A history of the university in Europe (Universities in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries (1800-1945), Vol. III, pp. 123-162). Cam­bridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lascombe, M. (2010). Le droit constitutionnel de la Ve Republique (11th ed.). Paris: L’Harmattan.

Laven, D., & Riall, L. (2000). Restoration government and the legacy of Napoleon. In D. Laven &

L. Riall (Eds.), Problems of government in restoration Europe: Napoleon's legacy (pp. 1-28). Oxford: Berg.

Lefebvre, G. (2011). Napoleon. New York: Taylor and Francis.

Lewy, C. (1998). The code and property. In B. Schwartz (Ed.), The code Napoleon and the common-law (pp. 162-176). Clark, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange.

Lombardo, P. (2001). 1808, 17 March: Discipline and Melancholy. In D. Hollier (Ed.), A new history of French Literature (3rd ed., pp. 613-616). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lorente, M. (2012). The new Spanish councils. In M. Broers et al. (Eds.), The Napoleonic empire and the new European political culture: War, culture and society, 1750-1850 (pp. 293-301). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Luchaire, F. (1998). Naissance d'une constitution: 1848. Paris: Fayard.

Lyons, M. (1994). Napoleon Bonaparte and the legacy of the French Revolution. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Magnon, X. et al. (Eds.), (2012). Pouvoir executif et Parlement: de nouveaux equilibres?: I 'impact de la revision constitutionnelle du 23 juillet 2008 sur le reequilibrage des institutions. Aix en Provence: Presses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille.

Mahoney, D. J. (2000). De Gaulle: Statesmanship, grandeur, and modern democracy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Manas, J. (2006). Napoleon on project management: Timeless lessons in planning, execution and leadership. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.

Marrani, D. (2013). Dynamics in the French constitution: Decoding French republican ideas. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

Marx, K. (2005). The Eighteenth brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: Mondial.

Meszaros, I. (2000). The legacy of 1848 and the Dilemmas of democratic revolutions. In D. Moggach & P. L. Browne (Eds.), The social question and the Democratic Revolution: Marx and the legacy of 1848 (pp. 43-48). Otawa: University of Otawa Press.

Metternich, C.W.L., FUrst von (1883). Fingerzeige fur den Minister des... Nr. 1949-1950. In Aus Metternich's Nachgelassenen Papieren (Vol. 8, pp. 462-472). Wien: Wilhelm BraumUller.

Million, C. (2006). L’application des regles dites “lois” de Vichy dans la zone rattachtie: la souverainete en question. In B. Durand et al. (Eds.), Le droit sous Vichy (pp. 253-284). Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.

Mitterrand, F. (2010). Le Coup d'Etatpermanent. Reed. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

Morgan, R. P. (2008). The German social democrats and the first international: 1864-1872. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Napoleon I. Emperor of the French (1819). Quartier general, Passariano, 3ejour complementaire an V [21 septembre 1797] A Talleyrand, ministre des relations exterieures. In Correspondance inedite officielle et confidentielle (Vol. 6, pp. 177-181). Paris: Panckoucke.

Napoleon I. Emperor of the French (1846). To the citizen president of the Cispadane Republic. Milan, 12 Nivose, year 5 [January 1, 1797]. In The Bonaparte letters and despatches, secret, confidential, and official from the originals in his private cabinet (pp. 187-188). London: Saunders and Otley.

Napoleon I. Emperor of the French (1861). Lettre de l’empereur a S.S. Le Pape, 13 fevrier 1806 (¹ 9805). In Correspondance de Napoleon ler (Vol. XII, pp. 38-40). Paris: H. Plon, J. Dumaine.

Napoleon I. Emperor of the French. (1861). Lettre de l’empereur au cardinal Fesch, 13 fevrier 1806 (¹ 9806). In Correspondance de Napoleon ler (Vol. XII, p. 40). Paris: H. Plon, J. Dumaine.

Napoleon I. Emperor of the French (1863). Pensee 190. In Maximes de guerre et pensees de Napoleon ler (5e ed., revue et aug., p. 258). Paris: J. Dumaine.

Napoleon I. Emperor of the French (1916). Napoleon in his own words. Chicago, AC: McClurg & Co.

Newman, E. L. (1974). The blouse and the frock coat: The alliance of the common people of Paris with the liberal leadership and the middle class during the last years of the Bourbon restoration. The Journal of Modern History, 46(1), 26-59.

Patterson, S. C., & Mughan, A. (1999). Senates and the theory of Bicameralism. In S. C. Patterson & A. Mughan (Eds.), Senates: Bicameralism in the contemporary world (pp. 1-31). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

Pilbeam, P. (1982). The growth of liberalism and the crisis of the Bourbon restoration, 1827-1830. The Historical Journal, 25(2), 351-366.

Pilbeam, P. (1983). The ‘Three Glorious Days’: The revolution of 1830 in provincial France. The Historical Journal, 26(4), 831-844.

Pinkney, D. H. (1973). The French Revolution of 1830. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Plessis, A. (1989). The rise and fall of the second empire: 1852-1871. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Portalis, J. M. E. (2004). Discours preliminaire du premier projet de Code civil. In Motifs et discours prononces lors de la publication du code civil (pp. 10-70). Bordeaux: Editions Confluences.

Price, R. (2001). The French second empire: An anatomy of political power. Cambridge: Cam­bridge University Press.

Reich, E. (2004). The code civil: 1804. In Select documents illustrating mediaeval and modern history (pp. 455-476). New York: Kessinger Publishing.

Rheinstein, M. (1998). The code and the family. In B. Schwartz (Ed.), The code Napoleon and the common-law world (pp. 139-161). Union, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.

Rolland, P. (2000). De l’art du preambule: le precedent de 1848. In J. Bart et al. (Eds.), La Constitution du 4 novembre 1848: l'ambition d’une republique democratique (pp. 148-186). Dijon, FR: EUD.

Rousso, H. (2006). The Vichy Syndrome: History and memory in France since 1944 (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rowell, D. (2012). Paris: The ‘New Rome' of Napoleon I. London: Bloomsbury Pub.

Rude, G. (2005). The French revolution of 1848. In The crowd in history: A study of popular disturbances in France and England, 1730-1848 (2nd ed., pp. 164-178). London: Interlink.

Schain, M. (2011). The fifth republic. In E. Berenson et al. (Eds.), The French Republic: History, values, debates (pp. 83-92). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Schmitt, C. (2008). Constitutional theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press (Translation of the 1928 German edition Verfassungslehre, Munich: Ducker and Humblot).

Schwartz, B. (1998). Preface. In B. Schwartz (Ed.), The code Napoleon and the common-law world (pp. VII-X). Union, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.

Schwarzfuchs, S. (1979). Napoleon, The Jews and the Sanhedrin. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Shirer, W. L. (1994). The collapse of the third republic: An inquiry into the Fall of France in 1940. New York: Da Capo Press.

Smith, P. (2005). A history of the French Senate (Vol. 1). The third republic, 1870-1940. New York: Edwin Mellen Press.

Smith, W. H. C. (2005). The Bonapartes: The history of a Dinasty. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Starr, P. (2006). Commemorating trauma: The Paris commune and its cultural aftermath. New York: Fordham University Press.

Stone, A. (1992). The birth of judicial politics in France: The constitutional council in compar­ative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Terraine, J. (2003). To win a war: 1918 The year of victory. London: Cassel Military Paperbacks.

Thornhill, C. (2013). A sociology of constitutions: Constitutions and state legitimacy in historical- sociological perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Tocqueville, A., & de Beaumont, G. (1968). Tocqueville and Beaumont on social reform. New York: Harper and Row.

Tsebelis, G., & Money, J. (1995). Bicameral negotiations: The Navette system in France. British Journal of Political Science, 25(1), 105-129.

Tulard, J. (1984). Napoleon: The myth of the saviour. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

van Caenegem, R. C. (2003). An historical introduction to western constitutional law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

van Caenegem, R. C. (2009). Judges, legislators and professors: Chapters in European legal history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Vaughan, M., & Archer, M. S. (2010). Social conflict and educational change in England and France: 1789-1848. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

vicomte de Chateaubriand, F. R. (2010). Reflexions politiques sur quelques ecrits du jour sur les interets de tous les Francais. Charleston, SC: BiblioBazaar. (Exact reproduction of the 1814 edition: Paris: Le Normant).

Vinen, R. (2002). Bourgeois politics in France: 1945-1951. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer­sity Press.

Vinen, R. (2007). ‘More than its Fair Share of History’: Europe and its recent past. In

M. Demossier (Ed.), The European puzzle: The political structuring of cultural identities at a time of transition (pp. 29-48). Oxford: Berghahn Books.

Voltaire (2009). Dictionnaire Philosophique. In T. Besterman (Ed.), The complete works of Voltaire (Vol. 40). Geneva: Institut et Musee Voltaire.

Watson, D. R. (2009). Georges Clemenceau: France. London: Haus Publishing Ltd.

Wawro, G. (2003). The Franco-Prussian war: The German conquest of France in 1870-1871. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Weber, E. (1966). France. In H. Rogger & E. Weber (Eds.), The European right: A historical profile (pp. 71-127). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Werth, A. (1957). Lost statesman: The strange history of Pierre Mendes France and the great conflict over French North Africa. London: Barrie.

Wetzel, D. (2001). A duel of giants: Bismarck, Napoleon III, and the origins of the Franco- Prussian War. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Woloch, I. (2001). The Napoleonic Regime and French society. In P. G. Dwyer (Ed.), Napoleon and Europe (pp. 60-78). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Woodward, E. L. (1963). War and peace in Europe: 1815/1870, and other essays. London: Thomas Nelson.

Woolf, S. J. (1992). The construction of a European world-view in the Revolutionary-Napoleonic period. Past and Present, 137(1), 72-101.

Woolf, S. J. (2003). Napoleon’s integration of Europe. London: Routledge.

Zeldin, T. (1963). Emile Ollivier and the liberal Empire of Napoleon III. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Further Reading

Abbott, J. S. (2006). The life of Napoleon Bonaparte. Teddington, UK: The Echo Library. Agulhon, M. (2002). 1848 ou l’apprentissage de la Republique: 1848-1852. Paris: Seuil.

Andress, D. (2012). The savage storm: Britain on the brink in the age of Napoleon. London: Little, Brown.

Alexander, R. S. (2002). Bonapartism and revolutionary tradition in France: The Federes of 1815. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Aron, R. (2004). De Gaulle, Israel and the Jews. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Asprey, R. (2002). The reign of Napoleon Bonaparte. New York: Basic Books.

Aston, N. (1988). Orleanism, 1780-1830. History Today, 38(10), 41-47.

Bayly, C. A. (1998). The first age of global imperialism, c. 1760-1830. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 26(2), 28-47.

Begley, L. (2009). Why the Dreyfus affair matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Beik, P. (1965). Louis Philippe and the July monarchy. New York: Van Nostrand.

Bernard, P., & Dubief, H. (1988). The decline of the Third Republic, 1914-1938. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Black, J. (2009). The war of 1812 in the age of Napoleon. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

Boudon, J.-O. (2002). Les elites religieuses a l’epoque de Napoleon: Dictionnaire des eveques et vicaires generaux du Premier Empire. Paris: Nouveau Monde.

Broers, M. G. (2012). The Napoleonic regimes. In W. Doyle (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Ancien Regime (pp. 489-505). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Broers, M., et al. (Eds.). (2012). The Napoleonic Empire and the New European political culture: (Wars, culture and society, 1750-1850). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Brogan, D. W. (1966). The development of modern France: (1870-1939). London: Hamish Hamilton.

Burrin, P. (1998). France under the Germans: Collaboration and compromise. New York: W. W. Norton.

Bury, J. P. T. (2003). France: 1814-1940 (6th ed.). London: Routledge.

Cahm, E. (1996). The Dreyfus affair in French society and politics. London: Longman.

Chandler, D. G. (2002). Napoleon. Barnsley, UK: Pen and Sword.

Chandler, D. G. (2002). The campaigns of Napoleon: The mind and method of history’s greatest soldier. London/New York: Folio Society/Scribner.

Charpentier, J. (1935). Napoleon et les hommes de lettres de son temps. Paris: Mercure de France.

Chevallier, J.-J. (2009). Histoire des institutions et des regimes politiques de la France de 1789 a 1958. Paris: Dalloz.

Clemenceau, G. (1929). In the evening of my thought. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

Collingham, H. A. C. (1988). The July monarchy: A political history of France, 1830-1848. London: Longman.

Comte de Las Cases, E. A. D. (1823). Memorial de Sainte Helene: Journal of the private life and conversations of the Emperor Napoleon at Saint Helena (Vol. 4). Lexington, KY: Printed by T. Smith.

Coutant, A. (2011). De la valeur d’un texte introductif: la Constitution francaise de 1848 et son Preambule. Revue Francaise de Droit Constitutionnel, 88(4), 681-707.

Crawley, A. (1969). De Gaulle. London: The Literary Guild.

Crozier, B. (1990). De Gaulle: The first complete biography. London: Collins.

de Balzac, H. (Ed.). (2011). Napoleon (suivi de Maximes et pensees de Napoleon). Paris: Ed. Payot et Rivages.

De Gaulle, C. (2000). Memoires. Paris: Gallimard.

De la Motte, J., & Przyblyski, J. M. (1999). Making the new: Modernity & the mass press in nineteenth-century France. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

de Stoeckl, A. (1957). King of the French: A portrait of Louis Philippe, 1773-1850. New York: G.P. Putnam & Sons.

Dippel, H. (Ed.). (2010). Constitutions of the world from the late 18th century to the middle of the 19th century: sources on the rise of modern constitutionalism. Europe, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Dreyfus, A. (2013). Five years of my life: 1894-1899. The diary of Captain Alfred Dreyfus. Stockbridge, MA: Hardpress Ltd.

Durant, W., & Durant, A. (1992). The age of Napoleon: A history of European civilization from 1789 to 1815. Norwalk, CT: Easton Press.

Dwyer, P. (2013). Citizen Emperor: Napoleon in power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Dwyer, P. G. (Ed.). (2001). Napoleon and Europe. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited. Edwards, S. (1971). The Paris commune, 1871. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.

Ellis, G. (1991). The Napoleonic Empire. London: Macmillan Press.

Fauvet, J. (1971). La IVeme Republique. Paris: Fayard.

Ferguson, N. (2007). The war of the world: Twentieth-century conflict and the descent of the west. London: Penguin.

Fiebeger, G. J. (2010). The campaigns of Napoleon Bonaparte of1796-1797 Against Austria and Sardinia in Italy. East Yorkshire, UK: Leonaur Ltd.

Fisher, T., & Fremont-Barnes, G. (2004). The Napoleonic wars: The rise and fall of an empire. Oxford: Osprey Publishing Ltd.

France (1876). Constitution de la IIIe Republique. Lois constitutionnelles de 1875. Paris: Imprimerie et librairie du Journal Officiel.

France (1876). Recueil des lois constitutionnelles et organiques voteespar I 'Assemblee Nationale. Paris: Sagnier.

Friedrich, C. J. (1967). The impact of American constitutionalism abroad. Boston, MA: Boston University Press.

Gildea, R. (1996). France since 1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Giraud, H-C. (2004). Replique a l'Amiral de Gaulle. Paris: Editions du Rocher.

Gunn, J. A. W. (2009). When the French tried to be British: Party, opposition and the quest for civil disagreement. 1814-1848. Kingston, Ontario: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Halls, W. D. (1995). Politics, society and Christianity in Vichy France. Oxford: Berg.

Hewlett, N. (1998). Modern French politics: Analyzing conflict and consensus since 1945. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Howarth, T. E. B. (1975). Citizen-king: The life of Louis Philippe, King of the French. London: White Lion Publisher.

Hutton, P. H. (Ed.). (1986). Historical dictionary of the Third French Republic, 1870-1940. New York: Greenwood Press.

Isenberg, I. (1967). France under De Gaulle. New York: H. W. Wilson.

Jackson, J. (2003). France: The darkyears, 1940-1944. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Johnson, P. (2002). Napoleon: A life. New York: Viking.

Julliard, J. (1981). La IVe Republique. Paris: Le Livre de Poche.

Kedward, H. R. (1985). Occupied France: Collaboration and resistance. Oxford: Blackwell.

Kedward, H. R. (2005). La vie en bleu: France and the French since 1900. London: Allen Lane. Kooreman, M. (1999). The expectation of Justice: France, 1944-1946. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Laniol, V., et al. (Eds.). (2014). Deux passions franchises. Pierre Mendes France et Charles de Gaulle. Paris: CNRS.

Larkin, M. (1997). France since the popular front: Government and people 1936-1996. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ledwidge, B. (1982). De Gaulle. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

Lissagaray, P. O. (2007). History of the Paris commune of 1871. St. Petersburg, Florida: Red and Black Publishers.

Lyons, M. (1994). Napoleon Bonaparte and the Legacy of the French Revolution. Basingstoke, UK/New York: Macmillan/St. Martin’s Press.

Lyons, M. (2000). Napoleon and the revolutionary potential of Bonapartism. Modern & Contem­porary France, 8(4), 507-10.

Madsen, M. R., & Thornhill, C. (Eds.). (2014). Law and the formation of modern Europe: Perspectives from the historical sociology of law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Magraw, R. (1983). France 1815-1914: The Bourgeois century. Oxford: Fontana.

Magraw, R. (1992). A history of the French working class (2 Vols.). Oxford: Blackwell.

Magraw, R. (2002). France, 1800-1915. A social history. Basingstoke, London: Longman.

Mangold, P. (2006). The almost impossible ally: Harold Macmillan and Charles de Gaulle. London: I. B. Tauris.

Mayeur, J.-M., & Rebirioux, M. (1988). The third republic from its origins to the great war, 1871­1915. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

McLynn, F. (1997). Napoleon: A biography. New York: Arcade Publishing Inc.

McMillan, J. F. (1992). Twentieth-century France: Politics and society 1898-1991. London: E. Arnold.

Napoleon I, Emperor of the French (2008). Aphorisms and thoughts. Richmond, UK: Oneworld Classics.

Napoleon I. Emperor of the French. (2009). Napoleon par Napoleon: Pensees, maximes et citations. Paris: Le Cherche Midi.

Nord, P. (2010). France's new deal: From the thirties to the postwar era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Nuenlist, C., et al. (Eds.). (2010). Globalizing de Gaulle: International perspectives on French foreign policies, 1958-1969. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Paul, R. P. (2012). The scandal that tore France in two: The Dreyfus affair. New York: Blooms­bury Press.

Paxton, R. O. (2001). Vichy France: Old guard and new order, 1940-1944. New York: Columbia University Press.

Petrey, S. (2005). In the court of the Pear king: French culture and the rise of realism. Ithaca,

N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Pilbeam, P. (1989). The economic crisis of 1827-1832 and the 1830 Revolution in provincial France. The Historical Journal, 32(2), 319-338.

Pinkney, D. H. (1961). A new look at the French Revolution of 1830. Review of Politics, 23(4), 490-506.

Popkin, J. D. (2002). Press, revolution, and social identities in France: 1830-1835. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Rader, D. L. (1973). The journalists and the July revolution in France: The role of the political press in the overthrow of the Bourbon restoration 1827-1830. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Raymond, G. (2008). Historical dictionary of France (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.

Reyn, S. (2010). Atlantis lost: The American experience with De Gaulle, 1958-1969. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Rioux, J. P. (1982). La France de la Quatrieme Republique (2 Vols.). Paris: Seuil.

Robert, T. (1999). The Paris commune: 1871. London: Longman.

Rude, G. (2000). Revolutionary Europe, 1783-1815 (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

Sebbane, J. (2009). Pierre Mendes France et la question du Proche-Orient: 1940-1982. Paris: L’Harmattan.

Shafer, D. A. (2005). The Paris commune. London: Palgrave.

Schom, A. (1997). Napoleon Bonaparte. New York: Harper Collins.

Schroeder, P. W. (1996). The transformation of European politics: 1763-1848. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stovall, T. (2002). France since the second world war. Harlow, UK: Longman.

Tombs, R. (1996). France: 1814-1915. London: Longman.

Trinkle, D. A. (2002). The Napoleonic press: The public sphere and oppositionary journalism. Lewiston, NY: E. Mellen Press.

von Beyme, K. (1987). America as a model: The impact of American democracy in the world. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Werth, A. (1967). De Gaulle: A political biography. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

Williams, C. (2005). Petain. London: Little Brown.

Winock, M. (1995). La Fievre hexagonale: Les grandes crises politiques de 1871 a 1968. Paris: Seuil.

Woloch, I. (2002). Napoleon and his collaborators: The making of a dictatorship. New York: W. W. Norton.

Woolf, S. J. (1991). Napoleon’s integration of Europe. London: Routledge.

Zeldin, T. (1958). The political system of Napoleon III. New York: Saint Martin's Press.

Zola, E. (1998). The Dreyfus affair: “J’accuse” and other writings. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

<< | >>
Source: Aguilera-Barchet Bruno. A History of Western Public Law. Between Nation and State. Springer,2015. — 788 p.. 2015

More on the topic The Constitutional History of France After Napoleon: From Monarchy to Republic: