Structural Elements of the System of Canon Law
THE NEW SYSTEM of canon law that was created in the eleventh and twelfth centuries embraced only those kinds of legal relations that fell within the jurisdiction of the church as a corporate legal entity.
Other legal relations fell within the respective, overlapping jurisdictions of various secular polities, including kingdoms, feudal domains, and autonomous cities and towns. Every person in Western Christendom lived under both canon law and one or more secular legal systems. The pluralism of legal systems within a common legal order was an essential element of the structure of each system.Because none of the coexisting legal systems claimed to be all inclusive or omnicompetent, each had to develop constitutional standards for locating and limiting sovereignty, for allocating governmental powers within such sovereignty, and for determining the basic rights and duties of members. In the canon law system, these constitutional standards were expressed primarily in terms of corporation law, including the law of corporate jurisdiction over particular classes of persons and particular types of subject matter.
Out of the system of ecclesiastical constitutional law there gradually developed relatively coherent bodies of substantive rules pertaining to other fields of law as well. Thus there gradually developed, out of the church's jurisdiction over the sacraments, a body of law pertaining to marriage; out of the church's jurisdiction over testaments, a body of law pertaining to inheritance; out of the church's jurisdiction over benefices, a body of law pertaining to property; out of the church's jurisdiction over oaths, a body of law pertaining to contracts; out of the church's jurisdiction over sins, a body of law pertaining to crimes and torts. There also developed, in connection with these five types of jurisdiction, a body of rules of judicial procedure. These bodies of law were not conceptualized in the same way that autonomous branches of law came to be conceptualized in later centuries; the canonists of the twelfth and thirteenth
-225-
centuries did not attempt to organize each branch of law________ property, contract, crime, and so forth
__ as a self_contained set of rules stemming logically from various principles and doctrines, which stemmed in turn from a general theory of property, a general theory of contract, a general theory of crime and punishment, and so forth.
The canon law of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries was less abstract, less "logical." Its categories had grown out of the jurisdiction of the ecclesiastical court s and out of the legal problems confronting those courts, rather than out of the speculative reasoning of academic jurists. Like the developing English royal law of the same period, the canon law tended to be systematized more on the basis of procedure than of substantive rules. Yet after Gratian, canon law, unlike English royal law, was also a university discipline; professors took the rules and principles and theories of the cases into the classroom and collected, analyzed, and harmonized th em in their treatises. And so subsystems of law did emerge, though without the high degree of autono my and doctrinal consistency that developed later.Each of the subsystems or fields of law manifested its own structural elements, and each manifested in a different way the structural elements of the system as a whole. The canon law of crimes, for instance, was founded on concepts of sin which affected all the other fields of canon law. In the other fields as well, one can identify pervasive features that helped to define canon law as a modern legal system.
More on the topic Structural Elements of the System of Canon Law:
- Berman H.J.. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press,1983. — 657 p., 1983
- The Development of Canon Law
- The development of canon law
- lus Commune
- The Rise of Modern Legal Systems
- 7.7.4 The Influence of Roman Law in Britain
- Conclusions
- Geographic Distribution of the Civil Law
- SOCIOLOGICAL CRITERIA OF LEGAL SCIENCE
- 11 CIVIL LAW AND LOCAL LAWS IN THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY