<<
>>

REFERENCES

Featured Readings

Benda-Beckmann, Keebetvon and Bertram Turner. 2018. “Legal Pluralism, Social Theory, and the State.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 50 (3): 255-74.

doi: 10.1080/07329113.2018.1532674

Erie, Matthew S. 2015. “Muslim Mandarins in Chinese Courts: Dispute Resolution, Islamic Law, and the Secular State in Northwest China.” Law & Social Inquiry 40 (4): 1001-30. doi: 10.nn/lsi.12137

Harding, Andrew. 2002. “Global Doctrine and Local Knowledge: Law in South East Asia.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 51 (1): 35-53. doi: 10.1093^^/51.1.35

Moore, Erin P. 1993. “Gender, Power, and Legal Pluralism: Rajasthan, India.” American Ethnologist 20 (3): 522-42. doi: 10.1525/ae. 1993.20.3.02a00040

Strating, Rebecca and Beth Edmondson. 2015. “Beyond Democratic Tolerance: Witch Killings in Timor-Leste.” Journal of Current Southeast AsianAffairs 34 (3): 37-64. doi: 10.1177/186810341503400302

Other Works Cited

Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von. 2001. “Transnational Dimensions of Legal Pluralism.” In Begegnung und Konflikt - eine Lulturanthropologische Bestandsaufnahme, edited by Wolfgang Fikentscher, 33-48.

Munchen: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, C. H. Beck Verlag.

Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von and Bertram Turner. 2018. “Legal Pluralism, Social Theory, and the State.” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 50 (3): 255-74. doi: 10.1080/07329113.2018.1532674

Chiba, Masaji. 2002. Legal Cultures in Human Society: A Collection of Articles and Essays. Tokyo: Shinzansha International.

Hooker, M. B. 1975. Legal Pluralism: An Introduction to Colonial and Neo­colonial Laws. Oxford: Clarendon Press. doi: 10.2307/2800821

----- 1978. A Concise Legal History of South-East Asia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kunkler, Mirjam and Yuksel Sezgin. 2016.

“The Unification of Law and the Postcolonial State: The Limits of State Monism in India and Indonesia.” American Behavioral Scientist 60 (8): 987-1012. doi: 10.2307/ 844595

Merry, Sally E. 1988. “Legal Pluralism.” Law & Society Review 22: 869-96. doi: 10.2307/3053638

Pospisil, Leopold. 1958. Kapauku Papuans and Their Law. New Haven, CT: Yale UniversityPublications in Anthropology, No. 54. doi: 10.1525^.1959.61.4.02a00340

Roberts, Simon. 1998. “Against Legal Pluralism: Some Reflections on the Contemporary Enlargement of the Legal Domain.” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 30 (42): 95-106. doi: 10.1080/07329113.1998.10756517

Sartori, Paolo. 2017. Visions of Justice: Sharia and Cultural Change in Russian Central Asia. Leiden and Boston: Brill. doi: 10.1163/ 9789004330900

Strating, Rebecca and Beth Edmondson. 2015. “Beyond Democratic Tolerance: Witch Killings in Timor-Leste.” Journal of Current Southeast AsianAffairs 3: 37-64. doi: 10.1177/186810341503400302

Ubink, Janine. 2018. “Introduction: Legal Pluralism in a Globalized World.” UC Irvine Law Review 8: 141.

Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Translated by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Suggested Readings

Benda-Beckmann, Franz von. 2002. “Who's Afraid of Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 47: 37-82. doi: r0.r080/ 07329rr3.2002.r0756563

Griffiths, Anne. 20rr. “Pursuing Legal Pluralism: The Power of Paradigms in a Global World.” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 43: 173-202. doi: 10.1080/07329113.2011.10756674

Griffiths, John. 1986. “What Is Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 24: 1-55. doi: 10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387

Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2002. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Emancipation. NewYork and London: Routledge. doi: 10.1017/9781316662427

<< | >>
Source: Chua Lynette J., Engel David M.. The Asian Law and Society Reader. Cambridge University Press,2023. — 795 p.. 2023

More on the topic REFERENCES:

  1. References
  2. References
  3. REFERENCES
  4. References
  5. References
  6. Appendix 2 Law Reports and Journals (Some Useful References
  7. References
  8. References
  9. References
  10. In the previous paragraphs, frequent references emphasized the notion of possession as a key to the acquisition of the right of ownership.