ONE CODE FOR EVERY COUNTRY?
Present-day Europeans live under their national systems of law, which are almost invariably codified. Frenchmen live under the Code civil, Germans under the Biirgerliches Gesetzbuch and the English under their own uncodified common law.
A few years ago the Dutch obtained a brand-new civil code, to replace that of 1838. European courts of justice, the European Commission, the European Parliament and European laws have not yet alÂtered the basic fact that people live under national laws which were produced by the sovereign national states. And most peoÂple, no doubt, find this a natural state of affairs, as natural as their various languages. What they do not realize and would be surprised to find out, is that this â€?natural state of affairs’ is, on the time scale of European history, quite recent (going back only one or two centuries) and that the rise of the European Union may turn it into a brief and transient phase. That a future United Europe will strive for some degree of legal unification is plausiÂble but, of course, uncertain. What is certain, however, is that medieval and early modern Europe managed without national legal systems. People lived either under local customs or under the two cosmopolitan, supranational systems — the law of the Church and the neo-Roman law of the universities (known as â€?the common, written laws’, or the learned ius commune). That every country should have its own strictly national law and be unaffected by others for many centuries was quite unthinkable. Cross-fertilization was the order of the day, because the law was seen as a vast treasure house from which kings and nations could pick and choose what suited them. We shall now present five illustrations of the transnational character of the law in Old Europe, the first three offering striking paradoxes.