Bibliography

Letters on the Compilation of a Judicial Code (1832). Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press.

Acharyya, B.K. (1914). Codification in British India: Tagore Law Lectures, 1g12. Calcutta: S.K.

Baillie, N.B.E. (1875). A Digest of Moohummudan Law on the Subjects to Which It is Usu­ally Applied by British Courts of Justice in India. Compiled and Translatedfrom Au­thorities in the Original Arabic, with an Introduction and Explanatory Notes. Part First Containing the Doctrines of the Hanifeea Code of Jurisprudence. Second Edition, Re­vised, with Some Additions to the Text, and a Supplement on Sale, Loan, and Mort­gage. London: Smith, Elder, & Co.

Benton, L. (2001). Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400-1g00. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Blackstone, W. (1893). Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books, Volume 1. Philadelphia: J.P. Lippincott.

Browne, E.G., and Ross, E.D., eds. (1902). Catalogue of Two Collections of Persian and Arabic Manuscripts preserved in the India Office Library. London: Eyre and Spottis- woode Press.

Cavanagh, E. (2019). Legal Thought and Empires: Analogies, Principles, and Authorities from the Ancients to the Moderns. Jurisprudence: An InternationalJournal of Legal and Political Thought 10 (4), pp. 463-501.

Cohn, B. (1996). Colonialism and Forms of Knowledge: The British in India. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Derrett, J.D.M. (1959). The Role of Roman Law and Continental Laws in India. Zeitschrift fur ausldndisches und internationales Privatrecht 24 (4), pp. 657-85.

Galloway, A. (1832). Observations on the Law and Constitution, and Present Government of India, on the Nature of Landed Tenures and Financial Resources, as Recognized by the Moohummudan Law and Moghul Government, with an Inquiry into the Adminis­tration of Justice, Revenue, and Police, at Present Existing in Bengal.

Gladwin, F. (1786). An Epitome of the Mohammedan Law. Translated from the Original Persian. Calcutta: William McKay.

Grady, S.G. (1869). A Manual of the Mahommedan Law of Inheritance and Contract, Comprising the Doctrines of the Soonee and Sheea Schools, and Based upon the Text of Sir W.H. Macnaghten’s Principles and Precedents. Together with the Decisions of the Privy Council and High Courts of the Presidencies in India. London: W.H. Allen.

Halliday, P.D. (2013). Laws' Histories: Pluralisms, Pluralities, Diversity. In: Lauren Ben­ton and Richard J. Ross, eds., Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500-1850, New York: New York University Press, pp. 261-77.

Hamilton, C. (1791). The Hedaya, or Guide: A Commentary on the Mussulman Laws. (2 vols). London: T. Bensley.

Harington,J.H. (1811). Remarks upon the Authorities of Mosulman Law', Asiatic Re­searches; or, the Transactions of the Society instituted in Bengal, For Inquiring into the History and Antiquities; The Arts, Sciences and Literature, of Asia 10, pp. 475-512.

Harington, J.H. (1821). An Analysis of the Laws and Regulations Enacted by the Governor General in Council, at Fort William in Bengal, for the Civil Government of the British Territories under that Presidency, Volume 1. London: A.J. Valpy.

Harington, J.H. (1866). Extractsfrom Harington’s Analysis of the Bengal Regulations. Calcutta: Office of Superintendent Government Printing.

Hussain, N. (2003). The Jurisprudence of Emergency: Colonialism and the Rule of Law. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Ibbetson, D. (2006). Sir William Jones and the Nature of Law. In: A. Burrows and A. Rodger, eds., Mapping the Law: Essays in Honour of Peter Birks, Oxford: Oxford Uni­versity Press, pp. 619-39.

Jones, M.E.M. (1918). Warren Hastings in Bengal 1772-1774. With appendixes to hitherto unpublished documents. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Jones, W. (1799). Works of WilliamJones in Six Volumes. (6 vols).

Kennedy, D. (2006). Three Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought: 1850-2000. In: D. Trubek and Alvaro Santos, eds., The New Law and Economic Development. A Criti­cal Appraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19-73.

Kennedy, V. (1835). An Abstract of Muhammedan Law. TheJournal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2 (1), pp. 81-165.

Leibniz, G.W. (2006). On the Interpretation, Foundations, Application and System of Laws. In: M. Dascal, ed., Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: The Art of Controversies. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 81-82.

Lieberman, David. (1989). The Province of Legislation Determined: Legal Theory in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Macnaghten, W.H. (1825). Principles and Precedents of Moohummudan Law, Being a Compilation of Primary Rules relative to the Doctrine of Inheritance (Including the Tenets of the Schia Secteraries), Contracts and Miscellaneous Subjects; and A Selection of Legal Opinions Involving These Points, Delivered in the Several Courts ofJudicature Subordinate to the Presidency of Fort William; together with the Notes Illustrative and Explanatory, and Preliminary Remarks. Calcutta: Church Mission Press.

Maine, H.S. (1892). Minutes by Sir H.S. Maine 1862-6g: with a Note on Indian Codifica­tion, Dated 17th July, 187g. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing.

Maine, H.S. (1920). Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and Its Relation to Modern Ideas. With Introduction and Notes by Frederick Pollock. Lon­don: John Murray.

Mantena, K. (2010). Alibis of Empire: Henry Maine and the Ends of Liberal Imperialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Marshall, PJ. (1973). Warren Hastings as Scholar and Patron. In: A. Whiteman, J.S. Bromley and P.G.M. Dickson, eds., Statesmen, Scholars, and Merchants. Essays in Eighteenth Century History Presented to Dame Lucy Sutherland. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp.

Mehta, U.S. (2017). Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Pagden, A. (1995). Lords of All the World: Ideologies of Empire in Spain, Britain and France, c. 1500-c. 1800. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Perry, E. (1850). Letter to Lord Campbell, Lord ChiefJustice of England, on Reforms in the Common Law: with a Letter to the Government of India on the Same Subject, etc., etc. London: J. Ridgway.

Perry, E. (1853). Cases Illustrative of Oriental Life, and the Application of English Law to India, Decided in H.M. Supreme Court in Bombay. London: S. Sweet.

Pitts,J. (2012). Empire and Legal Universalisms in the Eighteenth Century. American Historical Review 117 (1), pp. 92-121.

Pitts, J. (2018). Boundaries of the International: Law and Empire. Cambridge, Massachu­setts: Harvard University Press.

Pothier, R-J. (1780). Coutumes des duche, bailliage et prevote d’Orleans et ressort d’iceux; Avec une introduction generale a la tete de chaque Titre, corrigees et augmentees, dans lesquelles les principes des matieres contenues dans le Titre, sont exposes et develop- pes. Paris: Debure.

Rahman, (Nawab) A.F.M.A. (1907). Institutes of Mussalman Law. A Treatise on Personal Law according to the Hanafite School; with References to Original Arabic Sources and Decided Casesfrom 1795 to 1906. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink & Co.

Sartori, A. (2014). Liberalism in Empire: An Alternative History. Oakland: University of California Press.

Schacht, J. (1982). An Introduction to Islamic Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stewart, C. (1809). A Descriptive Catalogue of the Oriental Library of the Late Tipoo Sul­tan of Mysore, to which are prefixed, Memoirs of Hyder Aly Khan, and his son Tipoo Sultan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vanderlinden, J. (1967). Le concept de code en Europe occidentale duxιιι^e auxιx^e siecle. Essai de definition. Etudes d’histoire et d’ethnologie juridiques. Brussels: Editions de TInstitut de Sociologie de TUniversite libre de Bruxelles.

Wheeler, B.M. (1994). Orientalist �Translation’ and Anthropological �Reading’: Charles Hamilton versus Claude Levi-Strauss. Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies 3 (5), pp. 9-30.

Wilson, R.K. (1921). Anglo-Muhammadan Law: A Digest Preceded by a Historical and Descriptive Introduction of the Special Rules Now Applicable to Muhammadans As Such by the Civil Courts of British India, with Full References to Modern and Ancient Authorities. Fifth Edition. Revised and Brought Up-to-Date by A. Yusuf Ali. Calcutta/ Simla: Thacker, Spink & Co.