Overview of locations
After examining the multiple various locations of tribunals within Rome it is worth considering the impact upon the citizens of Rome of such a distribuÂtion of courts. It becomes apparent that some areas must have been very much alive with court activities, a point that indeed is frequently noted by ancient authors.
Let us briefly review the various locations.The Forum Romanum easily saw the most legal activity within its boundÂaries during the last years of the Republic and the first two centuries of the imperial period. Horace calls it the “differtum forum”, “the stuffed-full forum”.227 While various types of activities could take place there — includÂing individuals reciting their own writings “in medio foro” — courts likely filled a good portion of the space.228 Magistrates, lictors, scribes, litigants, advocates, family, friends, supporters, and general audience seeking a thrill, must all have been swarming through the whole area. We have placed numerous courts within this area. The praetor peregrinus occupied a central location. The praetor urbanus held court toward the eastern end — perhaps using the speaker's platform attached to the Temple of Divus Iulius. A numÂber of quaestiones perpetuae were also in this area during the first half of Augustus' reign, perhaps making use of the space within the Basilica Aemilia as the forum filled. Tiberius, Claudius, Vespasian, Domitian, and Hadrian held court within the forum as well;229 Claudius was there almost every day.230 In Nero's reign cases connected with the treasury were also moved here to be heard by recuperatores.231 Advocates must have spent a fair amount of their time in this “forum... triste”, “sad forum”, in the midst of a sea of courts.232 One great advocate, Philippus, advancing in years, comÂplains that this Forum is too far from his home.233
Even with the addition of Julius Caesar's forum, another was still needed.
The Forum of Augustus, once completed, housed the tribunals of both the praetor urbanus and the praetor peregrinus, which somewhat helped to ease the congestion of the Forum Romanum. The emperor also sometimes held court here.234 It seems that all public prosecutions were to be held here as well, “separatim”.235 Apparently legal activities here were so ubiquitous that makÂing an agreement to meet for a legal transaction required choosing a location more specific than “in the Forum of Augustus”. Rather, we see references to such places as the “statuam Cn. Senti Saturnini” and the “signum Dianae Luciferae”.236 Juvenal jokes about the amount of legal activity within this forum, calling a statue of Apollo that stood here “iuris... peritus Apollo”, “Apollo learned in the law”.237 Martial describes quite an enterprising advoÂcate, who “Ultorisprima Martis in aede sedet”, “sits at the entrance of Mars the Avenger's temple” and, apparently due to the demand for his services, is never free until after the tenth hour.238 From the list of activities we can place in this location, it would seem that during the first century the Forum of Augustus was used very much to its capacity.Anderson suggests that the Forum of Trajan displaced the Forum of Augustus as “Rome's palace of justice”.239 Such a statement implies that legal activity came to an end in the Forum of Augustus. Considering the size of the empire and the population of Rome, this is most unlikely. Even with the Forum of Trajan sharing the deluge, the courts still appear bogged down. Juvenal moans that everyone is in court with the same complaint.240 Martial's comment, a little earlier in date, is more poetic: “fora litibus omnia fervent”, “all the fora seethe with cases”.241 The Forum of Trajan housed the court of the consul, and perhaps that of the praefectus urbi. The jurisdiction of the urban prefect expanded greatly in the years following Augustus' death; thus, conÂsidering that the Tabulae Sulpiciorum and the Tabulae Herculanenses are examples from but two communities within Italy, and only from two archives that happen to survive, one can imagine the numbers of similar cases that were coming to Rome from the rest of Italy.
This does not even factor in the quantity of legal problems that came to Rome from the provinces through the appeals process. The overall number of proceedings could no doubt easily have filled the available space in the four fora of Rome.In such a physical environment the weather could certainly have had an impact on the courts. Seneca the Elder and Quintilian repeatedly state that the orator must be able to endure sun, wind, and rain while arguing before the court.242 Pliny the Elder as well as Dio record numerous occasions when awnings were stretched across the Forum Romanum; Julius Caesar and Marcellus, the son of Augustus' sister, during the latter's aedileship are reported to have covered that space because of the intense heat.243 The same was done again during the reign of Gaius.244 Pliny states explicitly that Marcellus was attempting to protect those engaged in lawsuits. The increased ratio between portico and open area found in all the imperial fora compared to the Forum Romanum perhaps suggests some attempt to forestall having to use such ad hoc methods of protection. However, considering the number of courts meeting in the Forum of Augustus, for example, we still must conÂclude that not all courts were housed within the porticoes, and that even the porticoes offered inadequate protection.
The fora of Rome clearly maintained strong connections with legal activÂities throughout the entire period of this study — to such an extent, in fact, as to impact upon the Latin language. Evidence ranging in date from the time of Seneca the Elder to that of Fronto suggests that Romans so linked the fora with the courts that they came to generalize the vocabulary for indicating a court's specific location. Seneca the Elder describes the advocate's arena as simply the forum.245 The speakers in Tacitus' Dialogus talk of undertaking cases as being “called to the forum” and of the bustling courts as “the frenzied and hazardous forum”.246 Fronto refers to his young pupil's transformation into an advocate by saying “he went down to the forum noble by birth, he returned more noble by eloquence than by lineage”.247 On another occasion Fronto apologizes to Marcus for his tardy response, saying he was on his way “to the forum” to plead a case.248 Perhaps the clearest generalized use of this term is found in Suetonius' writings when he describes Gaius Albucius Silus' retirement from advocacy with the phrase “he withdrew from the forum”.249 From what we have seen above, these remarks clearly cannot be referring solely to the Forum Romanum; hearings during these men's lifetimes were being held regularly in all of the fora.
Rather, we must conclude that referÂences to “the forum” over time came to serve as a non-specific description of legal activity that all understood to describe a broader topographical setting than just the Forum Romanum. Such generalized use of the term, however, does suggest that the fora accommodated the bulk of Rome's legal activities from Augustus until Marcus Aurelius; otherwise, surely the generalized terÂminology would not have developed.250 Altogether, there can be no question that the legal activities taking place in Rome filled many of the city's promiÂnent public spaces and certainly made the administration of Roman justice a very public affair.
More on the topic Overview of locations:
- Overview and Implications
- An overview of judges at Rome
- International intervention, be it with the aim of emergency relief, peacebuilding or development aid, often involves such a multitude of actors that it is hard to get an overview.
- CONTENTS
- Structure and scope
- Reading the case for the first time
- 1.3 State of the studies on Paul Koschaker
- 5.9 Koschaker and Point 19 of the NSDAP program
- Conclusions
- A Case-Study of Sovereignty and Autonomy in Italy
- Deficits, elections and the politics of economics